tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35705081171580865312024-03-13T19:54:39.804-07:00Environmental Justice in China环境正义在中国EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.comBlogger1509125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-74123965566043425432015-12-23T22:48:00.001-08:002015-12-23T22:48:13.418-08:00什邡钼铜项目因抗议下马 政府赔偿企业6377万元<div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>2012</span>年,什邡<span lang=EN-US>7·2</span>群体抗议事件让四川宏达股份有限公司(<span lang=EN-US>600331.SH</span>)在什邡投资的钼铜项目最终下马,如今,什邡市政府要对宏达股份进行清偿。</p><p class=MsoNormal>今日,宏达股份公告,经德阳市中级人民法院诉讼调解,停止建设钼铜项目的经济损失,四川什邡经济开发区管理委员会确认向宏达钼铜共计支付补偿款<span lang=EN-US>6377</span>万元,鉴定费<span lang=EN-US>5</span>万元,合计<span lang=EN-US>6282</span>万元。</p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal>宏达股份全资子公司四川宏达钼铜有限公司(简称宏达钼铜)在什邡市投资新建年产钼<span lang=EN-US>4</span>万吨、铜<span lang=EN-US>40</span>万顿钼铜多金属资源深加工综合利用项目(简称钼铜项目),于<span lang=EN-US>2012</span>年<span lang=EN-US>6</span>月<span lang=EN-US>29</span>日在什邡经济开发区举行开工奠基仪式。</p><p class=MsoNormal>不过,该项目开工不久,因担心环境污染,当地市民上街抗议,最后演变成群体性事件,市民冲进了什邡市委办公大楼,警方随后使用催泪弹和震爆弹驱散。当地政府最终宣布,"决定停止该项目建设,什邡今后不再建设这个项目。"</p><p class=MsoNormal>公告也称,<span lang=EN-US>2012</span>年<span lang=EN-US>7</span>月<span lang=EN-US>3</span>日,宏达钼铜收到什邡市人民政府通知(什府函(<span lang=EN-US>2012</span>)<span lang=EN-US>79</span>号):因什邡部分群众对钼铜项目环境影响<span lang=EN-US>"</span>不了解、不理解、不支持,反应强烈<span lang=EN-US>"</span>,要求钼铜项目停止建设。</p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal>钼铜项目自停止建设以来,宏达股份与什邡市政府进行了多次会议沟通和函件交流。<span lang=EN-US>2014</span>年<span lang=EN-US>6</span>月<span lang=EN-US>25</span>日,什邡市政府函宏达股份(什府函(<span lang=EN-US>2014</span>)<span lang=EN-US>78</span>号):<span lang=EN-US>"</span>如果因为终止建设钼铜项目给你公司造成经济损失,市政府授权四川什邡经济开发区管理委员会,以事实为依据,以法律为准绳,在充分核实的基础上,于<span lang=EN-US>2015</span>年底前清偿完毕。<span lang=EN-US>"</span></p><p class=MsoNormal>实际上,什邡市政府曾经努力拯救过该项目。从<span lang=EN-US>2013</span>年开始,什邡市政府组织了<span lang=EN-US>1210</span>个宣讲小分队进入每个村庄、街道进行宣讲,还邀请反对者前往河南洛阳和山东阳谷的冶炼企业参观,试图扭转市民们的认知。不过,最终该项目还是没有重启。</p><p class=MsoNormal>根据什府函(<span lang=EN-US>2014</span>)<span lang=EN-US>78</span>号精神,<span lang=EN-US>2015</span>年<span lang=EN-US>11</span>月<span lang=EN-US>23</span>日宏达股份与什邡市政府及相关部门就依法清偿停止建设钼铜项目的经济损失进行了协商,在查证账务、专项审核、司法鉴定的基础上,宏达钼铜提出了依法清偿停止建设钼铜项目的经济损失的相关诉求。不过,双方因清偿金额和方式未达成一致。</p><p class=MsoNormal>公告称,经德阳市中级人民法院诉讼调解,四川什邡经济开发区管理委员会确认向宏达钼铜共计支付补偿款<span lang=EN-US>6377</span>万元,支付鉴定费<span lang=EN-US>5</span>万元。补偿款分三期支付,第一期<span lang=EN-US>2015</span>年<span lang=EN-US>12</span>月<span lang=EN-US>31</span>日支付<span lang=EN-US>1918.1</span>万元(含鉴定费<span lang=EN-US>5</span>万元);第二期<span lang=EN-US>2016</span>年<span lang=EN-US>3</span>月<span lang=EN-US>30</span>日前支付<span lang=EN-US>1913.1</span>万元;第三期<span lang=EN-US>2016</span>年<span lang=EN-US>12</span>月<span lang=EN-US>31</span>日前支付<span lang=EN-US>2550.8</span>万元。</p><p class=MsoNormal>不过,公告还称,宏达钼铜<span lang=EN-US>2010</span>年<span lang=EN-US>11</span>月<span lang=EN-US>18</span>日至<span lang=EN-US>2015</span>年<span lang=EN-US>9</span>月<span lang=EN-US>30</span>日止(预计至<span lang=EN-US>2015</span>年<span lang=EN-US>12</span>月<span lang=EN-US>31</span>日),累计支出(含应付未付)金额为<span lang=EN-US>7448.51</span>万元(未经审计),不含应退还的预付土地款及耕地占用税<span lang=EN-US>5950</span>万元。<span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:SimSun'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-50879341148875505652015-10-23T06:30:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:30:28.835-07:00环保部:8月环境违法案共57件 罚款数额达4644万<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中国经济新闻网</span><span lang=EN-US> 2015-10-23 16:01:56</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 据中国之声《央广新闻》报道,环境保护部环境监察局局长邹首民介绍,</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,全国范围内实施按日连续处罚案件共</span><span lang=EN-US>57</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件,罚款数额达</span><span lang=EN-US>4644.43</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元;实施查封、扣押案件共</span><span lang=EN-US>335</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件;实施限产、停产案件共</span><span lang=EN-US>177</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件;移送行政拘留共</span><span lang=EN-US>189</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>起,移送涉嫌环境污染犯罪案件共</span><span lang=EN-US>166</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件。案件集中在企业私设暗管违法排污,操纵篡改自动监测数据,环保设施不正常运行等方面。</span><span lang=EN-US> </span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 邹首民介绍,与</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月情况相比,适用按日连续处罚案件数量基本持平,适用查封扣押案件数上升</span><span lang=EN-US>31%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,适用移送涉嫌环境污染犯罪的案件上升</span><span lang=EN-US>34%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,适用移送拘留案件数上升</span><span lang=EN-US>29%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,限产、停产案件数下降</span><span lang=EN-US>30%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 其中,辽宁实施按日连续处罚</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件,罚款金额共计</span><span lang=EN-US>737.34</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元;河南实施按日连续处罚</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件,罚款金额共计</span><span lang=EN-US>1087.19</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元;广东实施查封、扣押</span><span lang=EN-US>58</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件,限产停产</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件。浙江实施查封、扣押</span><span lang=EN-US>51</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件,移送行政拘留</span><span lang=EN-US>38</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>起,移送涉嫌环境污染犯罪案件</span><span lang=EN-US>81</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>件。辽宁、江苏、浙江、安徽、福建、河南、广东、贵州等地执行情况较好,辖区内整体较平衡。</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者杜希萌</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-19400085946420053942015-10-23T06:29:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:29:24.263-07:00甘肃:灌溉水带农药污染水源 12村民饮水中毒入院<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US> 17:44:21 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>来源:</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>每日甘肃网</span><span lang=EN-US>-</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>兰州晨报</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>疑似饮水中毒</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>康乐</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名村民入院</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 当地政府紧急关闭污染水源,水样已送检,事件正在调查中</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> </span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,记者从临夏康乐县人民政府网获悉,</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>19</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>50</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分许,康乐县苏集镇塔关村发生一起群众疑似饮水中毒事件,致多名群众住院观察治疗。事发后,当地政府紧急关闭污染水源,水污染原因正在进一步调查中。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 据悉,</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日疑似饮水中毒事件发生后,当地政府召开紧急会议,成立了由安监、卫计、水务、食药、农牧、公安等单位为成员的康乐县水污染突发事件处置领导小组,迅速开展各项工作。同时,组织苏集镇、村、社干部对该社群众逐户开展排查,对可能饮用被污染水的群众全部送往县医院、县中医院进行检查。关闭污染水源,告知群众停止饮用,并进行取样送检。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 经初步调查:康乐县信康肉牛养殖有限责任公司雇用周某、张某、赵某三人给其公司门前云杉苗木地</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>约</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亩</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>进行灌溉,在灌溉过程中,使用了甲拌磷和毒死蜱农药。由于采用了大水漫灌方式,带有农药的灌溉水渗入地下,污染了附近一口水井,导致使用该井水的塔关村田家坪社部分群众饮用后出现身体不适。目前,该中毒事故还在继续调查中,污染水样已送省疾控中心检测。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 截至</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日中午</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>,6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名住院群众已出院</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人,</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人继续治疗,</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名群众仍在继续观察治疗,各项生命体征平稳。</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>赵野</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-65801076601925356402015-10-23T06:28:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:28:56.685-07:00襄阳老河口市水管流出筷子长细虫 系污水倒流污染水源<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>襄阳要闻楚天快报</span><span lang=EN-US> [</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>微博</span><span lang=EN-US>] </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>肖劲越</span><span lang=EN-US>2015-10-22 07:30</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>陈先生家住老河口市循环经济产业园内。上周一晚,他打开自来水管接水。他看见:脸盆里的水很浑浊,盆底还有一条筷子长,头发丝细,暗红色的虫。这条虫子不停地扭动着身体,让人反胃。直至今日,这条虫还活着。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>最近几日,陈先生都不敢再饮用自来水,只好去买矿泉水。昨日,他致电楚天快报,希望相关部门尽快解决。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者了解到,该地由老河口市畅源城市水务公司供水二公司供水。这名工作人员说,前不久,产业园内一家企业排污时,污水倒流污染了自来水源头,影响了不少居民的饮用水安全。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>这名工作人员说,相关部门已介入调查。要求涉事企业在排污处加装截止阀。他们还会加强监管,防止类似情况再次发生。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-54859046444682427062015-10-23T06:27:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:27:21.550-07:00前三季度胶州湾水质一般 东北角污染最严重<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,胶州湾水污染防治研讨会举行,青岛市环境监测中心站发布了今年前三季度胶州湾水质状况及变化趋势分析,监测数据显示,前三季度胶州湾水质"一般",湾北部海域受污染程度较重,其中,湾内东北角水质最差。无机氮、活性磷酸盐、石油类是目前胶州湾水质的三大主要污染物,与去年同期相比,浓度皆有升高。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>胶州湾水质功能达标率下降</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据《近岸海域环境监测规范》,水质状况分为优、良好、一般、差、极差</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个级别,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前三季度,胶州湾整体水质状况的评定等级为"一般",与去年同期持平。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在研讨会上,市环境监测站列出了</span><span lang=EN-US>2010</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年以来胶州湾水质的历年状况,记者对比发现,</span><span lang=EN-US>2010</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年~</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,连续</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年胶州湾水质状况均为"差";</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年~</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,胶州湾整体水质状况连续</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年为"一般",整体来说,胶州湾水质还是呈现好转趋势的。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>目前,青岛市环保局在胶州湾内布设的监测点位共计</span><span lang=EN-US>39</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个,布设密度达到每</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平方公里</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个监测点位,监测频次为每年四次,分别在</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份进行。根据监测结果,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前三季度,胶州湾</span><span lang=EN-US>39</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个点位水质功能区达标率为</span><span lang=EN-US>69.2%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,同比下降</span><span lang=EN-US>5.2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点;</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前三季度,胶州湾</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个国控点位水质功能区达标率为</span><span lang=EN-US>64.3%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,同比持平。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>南部海域较好,东北角受污严重</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>胶州湾内海域面积共计</span><span lang=EN-US>360</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平方公里,湾内不同位置的水质污染状况也不尽相同。监测结果显示,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前三季度,胶州湾内一类水质海域面积占胶州湾总面积的</span><span lang=EN-US>41.8%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,二类水质海域占湾内总面积的</span><span lang=EN-US>24.3%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,一、二类水域面积占比达到</span><span lang=EN-US>66.1%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,比去年同期上升</span><span lang=EN-US>1.9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点。从分布位置来看,一、二类水域主要分布在李村河河口和大沽河河口连线以南的海域。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>三类海域面积占比</span><span lang=EN-US>12.8%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,主要分布在大沽河入海口和李村河入海口附近的海域。四类海域面积占比</span><span lang=EN-US>12.8%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,劣四类海域面积占百分比为</span><span lang=EN-US>8.3%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,主要分布在胶州湾东北角和西北角,监测分布图显示,湾内东北角海域的劣四类水域面积最大。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据青岛市环境监测中心站副站长崔文连分析,今年前三季度,胶州湾内一类水质面积比例同比升高</span><span lang=EN-US>3.4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点;二类、三类同比分别降低</span><span lang=EN-US>1.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>和</span><span lang=EN-US>5.7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点,四类和劣四类同比分别升高</span><span lang=EN-US>2.9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>和</span><span lang=EN-US>0.9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>三大污染物浓度均有升高</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在受污染水体中,检出的主要污染物共计</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>类,分别是无机氮、活性磷酸盐和石油类。其中,前三季度胶州湾石油类平均浓度为</span><span lang=EN-US>0.018mg/L</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,较去年同期升高</span><span lang=EN-US>38.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点。市环境监测站副站长崔文连对每一种污染物的来源分布做了进一步分析,她表示,石油类浓度升高,主要是由于第一季度黄岛附近海域</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个点位浓度超过二类海水水质标准(</span><span lang=EN-US>0.050mg/L</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>今年前三个季度,胶州湾活性磷酸盐平均浓度为</span><span lang=EN-US>0.014mg/L</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,较去年同期升高</span><span lang=EN-US>0.004mg/L</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,达到一类海水水质标准。但崔文连指出,墨水河入海口附近海域、胶州湾西北角的活性磷酸盐浓度偏高,有</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个点位活性磷酸盐浓度超过二类海水水质标准。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>前三季度胶州湾无机氮平均浓度为</span><span lang=EN-US>0.279mg/L</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,较去年同期升高</span><span lang=EN-US>0.002mg/L</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,达到二类海水水质标准。在胶州湾东北部的墨水河和楼山河入海口附近海域,水质受污最严重,水质呈现劣四类,其主要主要污染物就是无机氮。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-49034636402720778422015-10-23T06:26:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:26:44.478-07:00可口可乐深陷“环保造假”伪造污水监测数据<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>可口可乐瓶装厂伪造污水监测数据,逃避环保监管的消息已发酵几日。昨日,可口可乐公司表示,已开展内部自查,虽然可口可乐公司还未公布事发的具体原因,但是该事件已暴露出可口可乐公司在生产环节中存在污水监测甚至是环保管理上的漏洞。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> 9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,甘肃省兰州市环境监察局会同兰州市公安局环保分局执法人员,对甘肃中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司进行现场检查时发现,该公司通过改变污水在线监测设备采样方式伪造监测数据,逃避环保监管。该行为违反了《中华人民共和国水污染防治法》第二十二条、二十三条之规定。兰州市环境监察局依据《中华人民共和国水污染防治法》第七十二条的规定,对该公司下达了《责令改正违法行为决定书》。甘肃中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司违法事实清楚、证据确凿,兰州市环境保护局依据相关法律规定,将该案件移送到兰州市公安局进行处理。</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,兰州市公安局依法对中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司的主管人员处以行政拘留</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>天的处罚。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>工商信息显示,甘肃中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司由中粮可口可乐饮料</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中国</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>投资有限公司投资设立,主营业务为生产销售包括液体饮料、固体饮料、茶饮料、果蔬饮料、矿泉水、纯净水、咖啡等饮料在内的可口可乐系列饮料。而中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司正是中国最大的可口可乐瓶装业务投资公司。此次,可口可乐的瓶装厂出现伪造环保监测数据,在业内人士看来可口可乐有着推脱不掉的监管责任。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对于此次事件,昨日甘肃中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司回应表示,该公司目前已开展内部自查,并积极配合政府相关部门的调查。不过,该公司未公布改变污水在线监测设备采样方式,伪造检测数据究竟事出何因。业内人士称,不排除污水排放不合标准的可能。对此,也将持续关注。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据行业人士的介绍,饮料生产对于水资源的需求比较大,每生产</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>升饮料差不多耗费</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>升水,饮料企业不仅耗水量大,也在"水污染企业"的范畴内。所谓,水污染企业指的是向环境排放水污染的企业,公开资料显示,早在</span><span lang=EN-US>2009</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,可口可乐北京公司就被列入了北京市发改委、北京市环保局共同发布的"重点水污染企业名单",当时相关部门表示,可口可乐的污染物排放是达标的。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"节水、零排放"也是一直以来可口可乐工厂所标榜的符号。郑州太古可口可乐饮料有限公司是可口可乐"零排放"的试点,</span><span lang=EN-US>2011</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年该项目已实现了污水零排放,可口可乐当时称,这也标志着可口可乐在行业中率先建立零排放试点的成功。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>然而,这一次可口可乐却在甘肃工厂的"伪造监测数据"上跌了跟头。某饮料企业相关人士向北京商报记者表示,除了食品安全之外,环境保护也是食品企业另一个重要的形象标识,虽然目前还不能明确甘肃中粮可口可乐饮料有限公司是否涉嫌水污染,但是"动手脚"也暴露了可口可乐环保监测管理上的漏洞。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-28537289578867153252015-10-23T06:24:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:24:30.876-07:00四川省9月五大水系轻度污染 老鹰水库引水遇垃圾重度污染<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>06:00 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>四川在线</span><span lang=EN-US>-</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>四川日报</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本报讯(记者</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>刘宇男)</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,省环境监测总站发布《四川省</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月地表水水质状况》及《四川省</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月集中式生活饮用水水源地水质状况》,</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月我省五大水系轻度污染,资阳老鹰水库补充引水过程中遇河道垃圾致重度污染。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 从地表水水质状况看,</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月全省</span><span lang=EN-US>168</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个监测断面</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>点位水质监测显示,五大水系受到轻度污染。</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个湖库中</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个水质优良,但资阳老鹰水库为重度污染,主要污染指标为化学需氧量、总磷。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 从集中式生活饮用水源水质看,</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个市(州)政府所在地的</span><span lang=EN-US>39</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个在用饮用水水源地断面(点位)取水总量</span><span lang=EN-US>13034.97</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨,达标水量</span><span lang=EN-US>12748.20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨,水质达标率</span><span lang=EN-US>97.8%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,同比下降</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点、环比下降</span><span lang=EN-US>1.9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个百分点。其中,德阳地下饮用水水源地西郊水厂,因地质背景原因锰超标。</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月河流饮用水水源地粪大肠菌群超标出现在成都洞子口,攀枝花市水文站、徐家渡、金江,泸州市长江石堡湾、长江五渡溪,宜宾宋公桥和石门子;湖库饮用水水源地总氮超标出现在自贡市长湖水库。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-2974841350064752522015-10-23T06:23:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:23:34.896-07:00中国江西余江县一水库旁建养鸭场污染水质<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>依青山而居,傍绿水而生,这一直是余江县春涛镇硝坊水库附近几个村村民引以为豪的生活环境。但近几年来,村民们发现水库周边建起了养鸭场,数万只鸭子游荡在水库中啄食、排粪,污染了水质,散发出阵阵腥臭味,令周边村民叫苦不迭。今年五六月份,当地相关部门曾要求养鸭场限期整改,然而水库养鸭现象照旧。这到底是怎么回事呢?水库养鸭场缘何未彻底取缔?</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,记者来到余江县调查采访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>水库不是饮用水源强行取缔依据不足</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>走近硝坊水库,离堤坝近</span><span lang=EN-US>100</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米处就能闻到一股腥臭味。在千余亩水域中,中间养殖了一大片珍珠,而水库三个角落岸边均建有鸭棚,数万只鸭子或在岸边,或在水中啄食、嬉戏。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>春涛镇镇长段会柱向记者介绍,硝坊水库系国家小</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>型水库,十多年前本着充分开发利用水库资源的发展思路,当地政府将该水库承包给</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名当地人养鱼,但三年前承包人又瞒着镇政府及村委会,私下转租给南昌县</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名合伙人养鸭。直到今年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,包括他本人在内的镇干部到硝坊村检查工作时才发现水库中大规模养了鸭子。镇里就此向县环保局等部门报告,但因该水库不是饮用水源,且无明确规定水库中不能养鸭,强行取缔依据不足。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>谈到承包水库养鸭一事,养殖户邬贵武一脸困惑和无助。他拿出一份承租合同向记者介绍,他和另两位承包人均为南昌县向塘镇农民,各自都有养鸭技能。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,他们三人与硝坊水库原承包人桂某等人签下承租该水库合同。但签订合同前,他们没有向镇政府或相关职能部门征询意见,也不知道利用水库大规模养鸭会破坏环境,仅凭原承包人单方面怂恿就草率地签订了承租费近百万元的合同。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者注意到,该合同约定承租期限为</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年初至</span><span lang=EN-US>2022</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年底,</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年承包费为</span><span lang=EN-US>90</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元,并要求他们在</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年分两次付清</span><span lang=EN-US>90</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元承包费。而该合同约定款项中,并未提及该水库是否禁养鸭子或其他可能涉及污染环境及法律所禁止的经营利用活动。邬贵武说,目前,他们已共投入了</span><span lang=EN-US>300</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>余万元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>逐渐减少养殖规模给出过渡期助转型</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据段会柱介绍,为净化水库周边居民生活环境,又不影响养殖户利益,</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,镇政府出面与养殖户交涉,要求其减少养殖规模,勿大面积占用水库,并引导养殖户在水中养珍珠,此举不仅能起到净化水质作用,还能弥补养殖户损失。目前该养鸭场的规模已由</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万只减至近</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万只。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>邬贵武说,今年,水库周边村民已多次到他鸭场闹过,个别村民还捣毁他的养鸭设施。再加上当地政府职能部门数次检查,他们才渐渐明白水库养鸭之路已走不通了,也做好了另谋生路的想法。最令他们担心的是,水库签了</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年承包期,仅使用了</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,后</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年的承包费能退吗?他们为此找过原承包人商谈,但遭到拒绝。当前,他们积极配合春涛镇政府拆除了部分鸭棚,减少了一半的养殖规模。但他们请求,目前所养殖的近</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万只鸭子需明年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月才能全部出售,希望当地政府能让他们有个过渡期。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>春涛镇党委书记黄海有表示,考虑到邬贵武等</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>位农民在外乡创业艰难及其合法利益,在其养殖规模只减不增的前提下,镇里接受他的请求。但明年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月以后,该水库须清除人工养殖业,以维护青山绿水优美环境。镇政府将引导他们转型发展水库周边山林养鸡项目,并合理有效利用水库资源从事农家乐休闲经营活动。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-47129856497256762092015-10-23T06:22:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:22:44.608-07:00常庄水库一级水源地遭污染续:养殖场水管直通水库<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>2015-10-12 06:35:29</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 来源</span><span lang=EN-US>: </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>东方今报 </span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,东方今报刊发了《养鸡场、废品站、拆迁工地</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>轮番"欺负"郑州大水缸》的报道。当时,记者在常庄水库看到,一些村民不自觉,偷偷倾倒垃圾,导致咱一级水源地被祸害,而随着记者的深入调查,破坏咱们一级水源地的还不仅仅是这些垃圾,还有人在水库搞起了养殖,带着一帮"牲畜"欺负咱的大水缸。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>□东方今报记者</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>袁雅</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>文</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>张晓冬</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>图</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>【现场】</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>彩板房"骑"上防护网</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日上午,记者发现一些废品站、养猪场以及私家小作坊分布在常庄水库周边的水源保护区内,而成堆的生活垃圾依然存在,猛一看,你咋也不会相信这就是咱郑州人的大水缸。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据市民提供的线索,记者先来到在水库沿岸的道李村,沿着村西边一条水泥小道向南行走不到一公里,就到了天伦家园。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在天伦家园的西南角,有一个大门,进入大门后便穿越了水库边上的防护网,进入到了水库湿地上。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在水库湿地上,记者惊讶地发现,五六间紧挨防护网修建的彩板房拔地而起,有两间彩板房直接突破防护网后,建成了一个观景台。与此同时,在紧挨湿地的边上,有人正在搭建新的彩板房。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>【追踪】</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>养殖户水管直通水库</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在彩板房之间的间隙上,防护网被人为地变成了可以开启的小门,小门的旁边是拿防护网做后墙建的一溜家禽宿舍。夸张的是,有一根直径二十多厘米的水管从彩板房里伸出后直接通到了水库的水里。仿佛自家的生态庄园一般,鸡、鸭、羊各自成群地在湿地或水面上自由活动。湿地上,到处是鸡鸭羊粪和鸭毛,偶尔还闻到阵风送来的异味。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者几经打探,才了解到,湿地和水里的鸡、鸭、羊群都是"有主"的,主人就是修建这几间彩板房的人。该主人承包了紧挨水库湿地边上的荒地后,刚开始是用来搞果木种植的,最近几年看着地方比较隐蔽,就在防护网上撕开了口子,在水库边上搞起了养殖。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>【直击】</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>岸边小作坊"不安分"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>同时,记者探访了之前报道的水库垃圾,想看下是否有改观。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者发现,道李村那家废品站门前紧挨水面的废品,已经挪到了距离水库水面约十米外的位置。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>水库岸边缓坡上倾倒的大量生活垃圾已被人用黄土遮盖起来,但是仍能看出黄土下面裸露出的片片生活垃圾。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该处岸边,仍有大量的生活垃圾,里边还有一些剥去铜芯的电线胶皮,有些已经滑进了水里。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"站在岸边高处能看到的垃圾已被他们用黄土盖上了,这些站在岸上看不到的,所以就没人管了!刚刚从上面还撂下来一些垃圾,有的都滚进水里了……"一位在水边垂钓的男子说。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据该男子介绍,附近还有一个生产石膏板的作坊,做石膏板用的废料都直接堆放在水库的陡崖上,下面就是水面。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据男子指引,记者在附近发现了这个石膏板作坊,作坊紧挨水岸,一大堆白色石膏粉就堆放在离水岸不远的地方。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>废料附近,紧挨水面不到五米处是一座为作坊人员修建的旱厕,旱厕后面的化粪池距离水面更近,大约有三米的距离,虽然上面盖着一块木板,但仍能闻到阵阵恶臭。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>距其不远,记者又发现一家养鸡场和一家养猪场,在两家养殖场之间有一条正流淌着臭水的土渠,里边的大量脏水正源源不断地向北边的荒草深处流去。这样一条用土垒的脏水沟渠,就建在水库岸边的斜坡上,一旦溢出或遭遇雨水,去向可想而知。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>【管理处】</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>约上记者一起去核实</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据《郑州市城市供水管理条例》和水资源相关保护条例的相关规定,在一级水源保护区内,禁止堆放工业废渣、城市垃圾和其他废弃物。在水源地周边</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米保护范围内,严禁倾倒和堆放有毒有害化学物品以及对水源能造成严重污染的污染物。在</span><span lang=EN-US>200</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米范围内,不得新建、改建、扩建与城市供水设施和保护水源无关的项目。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>但是无论是石膏板小作坊,还是湿地的养殖场,明显已经触犯了相关规定。记者致电常庄水库管理处杨副主任时,她了解了一些具体情况,邀请记者和他们一起核实具体地点,落实情况后具体处理。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本文来源:东方今报</span><span lang=EN-US> )</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-73933593029058825182015-10-23T06:21:00.001-07:002015-10-23T06:21:57.357-07:00莆田去年27个饮用水源地水质较差 主要因农业畜禽养殖污染等<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>来源</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>闽南网</span><span lang=EN-US> 2015-09-23 14:35 http://www.mnw.cn/ </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>海峡都市报电子版</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 记者昨日获悉,根据莆田市去年环境质量报告,全市现有</span><span lang=EN-US>27</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个集中式地表水饮用水水源地,水质达标情况不容乐观,主要超标污染物为总磷、总氮,主要原因是农业污染、畜禽养殖污染等。根据今年的饮用水源保护和供水保障工作方案,政府将筹集饮用水源生态补偿资金</span><span lang=EN-US>6600</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元,用于污染整治项目,建设市第三自来水厂、妈祖城水厂,禁止在饮用水源保护区内继续开山种果,扩大果园面积,禁止新批矿山开采项目等。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 据介绍,在农业污染源方面,库区一级、二级保护区范围内的农田、果树、桉树等追肥、施药造成的陆域面源污染物随雨水径流进入水库,水库周边部分畜禽养殖场(户)"反弹复建",以及库区长期以来累积的氮磷污染物,直接导致水体水质富营养化。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 另外,饮用水源地保护区范围内部分乡镇生活污水、垃圾等收集、清运未及时到位,污水管网和相关处理设施建设较为滞后。同时,饮用水应急保障能力较差,各自来水厂供水管网联网改造仍未到位。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 根据整治计划,年底将完成对</span><span lang=EN-US>27</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个乡镇级以上饮用水源地防撞设施建设,提高风险防范能力。禁止在饮用水源保护区内继续开山种果,不得继续营造桉树等速丰林,同时对现有果园及桉树等速丰林要逐步改造,种植其他阔叶树混交林,改善林种结构。(海都记者</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>林养东)</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-22624396111576005662015-10-14T23:58:00.001-07:002015-10-14T23:58:22.225-07:00安徽凤阳水泥厂严重污染环境导致众多村民患上尘肺病(图)<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(维权网信息员柳怡报道)近日,安徽滁州凤阳县武店镇村民王从水等几位村民投诉称:他们那里因砂石厂和水泥厂污染严重,许多人得了尘肺病。为此,村民们不断到各级主管部门上访、投诉控告,但问题至今没有得到解决。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据了解,凤阳的环境严重污染是当地一家名为"凤阳珍珠水泥有限公司",即"凤阳珍珠水泥厂"的私企造成的。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>凤阳县珍珠水泥厂是安徽最大的民营水泥厂,注册资金</span><span lang=EN-US>3.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亿,总资产</span><span lang=EN-US>4.6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亿,年产水泥</span><span lang=EN-US>300</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨,是凤阳县第一纳税大户,老板高允连是第十届全国人大代表,这些都是互联网上可以查到的公开信息。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"水泥大王高允连"这个称号,在当地是家喻户晓。因为自"凤阳县珍珠水泥厂"生产以来,凤阳的百姓就成天生活在"沙尘暴"里。为此,村民不断到政府有关部门投诉、控告毫无结果。凤阳县国土资源局出具的一份信访事项告知书称:"凤阳珍珠水泥集团股份有限公司依法享有采矿权!",让绝望中几度下跪的百姓只能永远地做了"肉体吸尘器"!</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>近年来,凤阳的适龄青年参加征兵体检,结果多是矽肺病。当地村民说仅凤阳武店镇每年就有</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多人因环境严重污染致病而死。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>新浪网友王琳琳(微博:</span><span lang=EN-US>@</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>你在红尘我在天上</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)等到现场实地调查的网友透露和描述:走进凤阳,走进武店,我在漫天的飞沙中窒息哀思愤慨,在川流不息的运输车后,我们深陷在泥石流里,沙尘里,灰暗里,雾霾里,仿佛行走在沙漠里。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>一刹那,我们的车落上厚厚的水泥沙,我们消失在尘土飞扬的黑夜里。是什么把天空变得肮脏,是什么把碧水变成腥臭的污泥坑,是什么让这里的人民死亡?</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>我们走访了武店村数名村民,原来这里的山林地富含水泥矿石和石灰石资源,许多黑企业地方恶势力相互勾结私自购买制造大量炸药放炮,非法大规模偷采盗采矿山</span><span lang=EN-US>,</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>并藏有大量雷管,炸药,起爆器,导爆管等,百姓的生命随时都有危险!</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>武店村</span><span lang=EN-US>63</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>岁的老书记邢德和告诉我们,他</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前辞了书记后承包了刘府镇光明村的一座荒山用于植树造林、生产、养殖等。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年底,凤阳珍珠水泥厂未经邢德和同意在他的山上进行非法开采石灰石,非法买卖,非法使用爆炸物,并大量砍伐树木和破坏山体植被,严重危及当地百姓的生命和财产安全。村民们多次向省市县各级政府反应,无人理睬。目前,邢德和承包的山林已被炸的面目全非,整个武店镇刘府镇都笼罩在沙尘带来的死亡阴霾里。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>另据了解,王琳琳因通过微博曝光和向当地有关部门投诉举报了"凤阳珍珠水泥厂"严重污染环境的问题,遭到了威胁和恐吓,但她表示绝不退缩,一定要为凤阳百姓讨个说法,她希望媒体和有关部门关注她反映的问题,尽快解决凤阳的环境污染问题。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>图片</span><span lang=EN-US>1-5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>:拍摄地,凤阳县武店镇</span><span lang=EN-US>,</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(图片来源于王琳琳微博:</span><span lang=EN-US>@</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>你在红尘我在天上</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-30746321798558752272015-10-13T01:47:00.001-07:002015-10-13T01:47:43.049-07:00天津又爆炸?官方:一家无证仓库起火伴有爆炸,暂无伤亡报告<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>澎湃新闻记者</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>梁月静</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2015-10-13 00:55</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日深夜,多名网友反映,当晚,天津市北辰区西提头镇耀华油漆厂发生爆炸,一声巨响后,现场火光冲天浓烟滚滚。天津市公安局微博消息称,爆燃于</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日凌晨</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>33</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分被扑灭,现场无人员伤亡。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>北辰区西提头镇政府值班人员于</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日凌晨</span><span lang=EN-US>0</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右告诉澎湃新闻(</span><span lang=EN-US>www.thepaper.cn</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>),现场是库房着火,起火原因尚不明确,但并非爆炸,目前已有消防官兵进驻现场,政府领导也已赶赴现场,暂未收到人员伤亡信息。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>@</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人民日报</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>微博</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>随后(</span><span lang=EN-US>0</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>52</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分)发布消息称,据天津市北辰区委有关部门介绍,</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日晚</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>点</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,天津市北辰区西堤头镇一家无证照储存氨水和酒精的仓库发生大火并伴有爆炸,截至目前尚无人员伤亡报告。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>@</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平安天津</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>微博</span><span lang=EN-US> 13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>03</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分发布消息称,</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>46</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分,天津公安消防总队接报警,位于北辰区西堤头镇西堤头村的一仓库发生爆燃。接报后,公安消防、属地北辰分局警力迅速赶到现场处置。目前,扑救工作仍在进行,现场无人员伤亡。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>当日</span><span lang=EN-US>02</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>53</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分,</span><span lang=EN-US>@</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平安天津</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>续报,经公安消防、交通及属地北辰分局协同作战、全力扑救,发生在北辰区西堤头镇西堤头村一仓库的爆燃于</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日凌晨</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>33</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分被扑灭,现场无人员伤亡。事故原因正在进一步调查。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>另据央视援引天津消防消息,</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日晚天津市北辰区西堤头镇一个约</span><span lang=EN-US>500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平米的一个仓库起火。起火原因为酒精原料外溢起火,后蔓延到整个仓库。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-63819301282976928302015-10-13T01:40:00.001-07:002015-10-13T01:40:27.734-07:00走出垃圾焚烧的泥潭<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在我国面临着实实在在的现实危机,除常规污染物排放不达标及灰渣违法处置这些常见问题外,其二噁英和汞污染风险已经不容忽视。从借鉴发达国家经验教训及可持续发展的角度看,垃圾焚烧不能成为应对垃圾问题的优先对策,而我国目前整体及局部地区的环境容量也不允许焚烧规模的继续扩张。在介绍这些基本形势的同时,本文提议政府部门、民间组织、普通公众合力加强对垃圾焚烧的监督,有目标、有计划地逐步摆脱对垃圾焚烧的依赖。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>近几年来,许多地方的公众都质疑或反对垃圾焚烧厂项目的规划和建设,也有很多已经建起运营的焚烧厂遭遇周边居民的持续投诉或抗议。为何政府官员和技术专家口中的"现代化垃圾处理技术"如此不受公众待见</span><span lang=EN-US>?</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>撇开那些"安全无忧"的空洞说理,焚烧厂已经出现的种种污染问题,以及有悖于可持续发展的特性急需社会各界的正视。</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>一、不可忽视的现实危机</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>如许多人所知,垃圾焚烧排放出来的污染物非常多,但目前由《生活垃圾焚烧污染控制标准》直接管控的仅有</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>种,既包含常规污染物,如:烟尘、一氧化碳、二氧化硫、氮氧化物、氯化氢等,也包含一些特征污染物,如持久性有机污染物二噁英和重金属汞。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对反对焚烧的公众而言,二噁英无疑是最让他们敏感的,而许多科研信息或政府公开数据也证实这些担忧不无道理。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>首先看看我国垃圾焚烧行业二噁英的总体污染形势。</span><span lang=EN-US>2009</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,中国城市建设研究院学者发表论文称,</span><span lang=EN-US>2007</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年中国全国生活垃圾焚烧厂</span><span lang=EN-US>(60</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>至</span><span lang=EN-US>70</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>的估算二噁英大气排放量为</span><span lang=EN-US>157.93 g TEQ(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>毒性当量</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,相比</span><span lang=EN-US>2004</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年的估算量</span><span lang=EN-US>125.8 g TEQ</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,已有显著增长。与此相比较,德国</span><span lang=EN-US>1994</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年生活垃圾焚烧的二噁英大气排放量仅为</span><span lang=EN-US>30 g TEQ</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,进入</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>世纪后</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>共</span><span lang=EN-US>60</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多座</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,年排放量估计降至</span><span lang=EN-US>0.5 g TEQ</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>以下。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>有专家认为,随着技术水平的不断提高,我国垃圾焚烧行业的二噁英排放会逐步降低,但这样的观点没有考虑该行业垃圾处理总体规模的急剧增大,可能会抵消技术水平提高带来的减排效果,甚至使问题更趋恶化。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对于普通公众而言,要准确预测焚烧厂的二噁英污染风险,目前几乎是不可能的,因为无论是焚烧厂自身还是监管它们的政府部门都极少主动公开相关信息</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>即便遇到公众申请,也是千百般地回避或拒绝。</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,环保组织芜湖生态中心曾先后向全国</span><span lang=EN-US>31</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个省</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>直辖市、</span><span lang=EN-US>76</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个市</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>区级环保局,针对全国</span><span lang=EN-US>122 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座在运行垃圾焚烧厂的污染控制情况进行信息公开申请,结果只获得</span><span lang=EN-US>42</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座厂的排放监测数据,而且其中仅有</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座厂的二噁英排放数据,占总体的</span><span lang=EN-US>8%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>如此之多的公共信息缺失,也并不完全因为相关部门的不情愿。在</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年底一起环境信息公开行政诉讼案的审理过程中,被告广州市环保局承认:它们之所以不公开广州李坑焚烧厂的一部分二噁英排放信息,是因为</span><span lang=EN-US>2009</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年以前根本就没有监测。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>虽然可获得的信息有限、数据有限,一些科研文献还是让公众可以窥见我国垃圾焚烧厂二噁英污染问题的冰山一角。</span><span lang=EN-US>2009</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,几位中国科学院学者发表了他们对中国</span><span lang=EN-US>19</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座生活垃圾焚烧厂二噁英大气排放水平的研究,结果表明,有</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座达不到欧盟</span><span lang=EN-US>0.1 ng TEQ/m3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>的标准,有</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座甚至超出我国旧的</span><span lang=EN-US>1 ng TEQ/m3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>的国家标准。而对于一直处在风口浪尖的广州李坑焚烧厂,广州城管委曾夸下海口称其二恶英排放能达到欧盟标准,但实际被迫公开的数据却显示不能达到。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>焚烧厂导致周边环境二噁英污染,也是有据可循的。</span><span lang=EN-US>2008</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,上海市检测中心研究者发表论文,报告上海嘉定某焚烧厂周边土壤中二噁英含量明显高于背景土壤的水平,于是得出结论:焚烧炉是上海地区土壤中二噁英污染的一个来源。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,温州市环保局罕见地公开了该局对当地一座垃圾焚烧厂的二噁英排放和污染情况进行监督性监测的信息,结果表明,虽然烟气排放数据达到国家标准,但焚烧厂周围有一处地点大气二噁英水平达</span><span lang=EN-US>3.98 pg TEQ/m3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,已严重超过我国环境影响评价政策对垃圾焚烧厂二噁英污染影响预测的限值规定</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>等同于日本目前的大气二噁英浓度限值</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>就在不少政府官员和技术专家忙于给垃圾焚烧厂二噁英污染去"妖魔化"的时候,这个行业的汞污染防治压力也在悄然增加。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>总体而言,垃圾焚烧行业已被证明是人为汞排放的主要污染源。根据华南理工大学学者</span><span lang=EN-US>2011</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年发表的一篇论文,生活垃圾焚烧的汞排放量占珠江三角洲人为总排放量的</span><span lang=EN-US>21%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,仅次于燃煤排放</span><span lang=EN-US>(28%)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。另一项由</span><span lang=EN-US>Dan Hu</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>等人在</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年发表的论文显示,自</span><span lang=EN-US>2004</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>至</span><span lang=EN-US>2010</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,我国城市固体废弃物燃烧的汞排放量从每年</span><span lang=EN-US>0.9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨增长到了</span><span lang=EN-US>6.1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨,平均增长率达</span><span lang=EN-US>37.3%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>如果将失控的汞排放总量分解到具体的垃圾焚烧项目上,情况同样也是严重的。如许多人所知,今年环保部和国家质检总局联合发布了修订后的《生活垃圾焚烧污染控制标准》。值得注意的是,标准的二次征求意见稿曾一度将汞排放限值由一次征求意见稿中向欧盟看齐的</span><span lang=EN-US>0.05mg/m3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>放松至</span><span lang=EN-US>0.1mg/m3(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>旧国标限值为</span><span lang=EN-US>0.2mg/m3)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。最终,在各方压力之下,才又恢复至一次征求意见稿、即欧盟标准的水平。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据环保部发布的上述标准二次征求意见稿的"编制说明",编制单位调查了国内</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座生活垃圾焚烧厂的烟气汞排放水平,如果参照现行标准,仅</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座能够达标,如果参照二次意见稿标准,则有</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>座可以过关。由此可见,环保部之所以在汞排放限值的制定上反反复复,实则是我国垃圾焚烧厂汞污染防治的客观严峻形势所致。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>与二噁英问题一样,垃圾焚烧厂已经给周边带来了实实在在的汞污染。</span><span lang=EN-US>2005</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,汤庆和等发表学术论文,报告上海浦东生活垃圾焚烧厂周边环境的土壤汞污染水平呈增加趋势,下风口土壤及大气汞污染水平都较其他方位明显高。</span><span lang=EN-US>2009</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,赵宏伟等发表学术论文,认为深圳市清水河垃圾焚烧厂周围的优势植物均受到一定程度的汞污染,而且与焚烧厂的污染物排放有直接关系。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,华南理工大学学者发表论文,显示广州李坑焚烧厂周边土壤、水体及植物都受到轻度至中度的甲基汞污染,且变化趋势与焚烧厂运营时间有一定的联系。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>以上讨论的仅是我国垃圾焚烧厂排放出来的两种最有害物质的污染情况,其他一些常规大气污染物的控制及灰渣的污染防治也存在不同程度的问题。例如,本不应该出现在焚烧厂厂界内外的高浓度恶臭气体,却成了各地居民反复投诉的公害。一些公开的污染监测数据——尽管非常有限——显示某些焚烧厂二氧化硫、一氧化碳等常规污染物超标情况严重。此外,近期媒体和公众陆续揭露了不少焚烧厂飞灰非法处置的问题,一位垃圾焚烧行业内专家也坦陈,全国范围内这种危险废弃物得到妥善处置的比例可能只有一半。更让人担忧的是,对于那些弥漫着恶臭、经常超标排放、违法倾倒废物的焚烧厂,各地的政府监管部门却鲜有采取措施果断关停、整改、处罚的,公众对于这样的一种污染行业及其监管部门投以极不信任的态度是很自然的。</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>二、垃圾焚烧没有继续发展的空间</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>垃圾焚烧这个行业要继续扩充、发展,得具备两个条件。一是源源不断可供其处理的垃圾,二是环境容量足够消纳其产生的污染物。现实中,这两点都可能对垃圾焚烧发展构成障碍。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时间若倒退大概</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,在填埋处于垃圾处理技术统治地位的时代,我国环卫工程界就已经开始向往有朝一日能够赶上西方发达国家的先进步伐,用焚烧"消灭"垃圾。当时之所以迟缓,不过是因为我国的垃圾组分及经济实力还不能支撑焚烧的发展。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>现如今,由于我国经济实力的增强,无论是政府还是民间,都有能力投资兴建焚烧厂,钱的事情已不在话下。虽然还有许多人担心垃圾水分太高、热值不够,但原则上通过必要的预处理,还是可以烧起来的。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>虽然"烧得起"、也能"烧起来",但焚烧厂要是没有足够的垃圾供给,显然就没有建设的必要。目前,我国各种环境保护和城市建设管理法规都明确要求、倡导或鼓励生活垃圾要分类投放、分类运输和最终分类处理,一些中央或地方的法规政策还在积极尝试从源头抑制垃圾的产生</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>如食物垃圾浪费、过度包装</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。如果这种管理思路落实得有效,将有至少一半的垃圾,包括厨余有机物、可回收物、园林废弃物、建筑垃圾不会进入焚烧厂或填埋场,混合垃圾处理设施的建设冲动就会大大降低。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>当然,现实中很多人认为关于垃圾减量和分类的法规政策根本不会对焚烧构成限制,因为这些纸上条文实际都是虚设的,充其量也不过是一种理想宣示而已</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>真正体现政府意志的是那些给垃圾焚烧设置的一系列规划目标、政策优惠、电价补贴等实实在在的利好条件。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>冷静地分析,当正反政策同时存在的时候,那种最大程度适应目前社会状态,不会给政府、产业、公众带来太多"麻烦"的办法是更具优势的,那种会给大家带来改革阵痛的想法是令人讨厌的。也就是说,当全社会的垃圾仍在源源不断大量产生、混合投放的情况下,为消纳混合垃圾而设计建设的焚烧厂是最容易被各方接受的,尤其是负责垃圾管理的政府部门</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>大多数公众在没有受到直接威胁或信息不充分的情况下,也会舒坦地保持既有的生活惯性,而无需做出改变。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>令人感慨的是,无论是</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前还是现在,我们在垃圾管理上一直引以为师的西方发达国家却在对待焚烧的态度上发生了根本性的变化。这种变化首先发生在欧盟国家身上,并体现在其近几年一系列的法规政策和高级政府官员的话语中。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2008</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,欧盟委员会正式发布了垃圾管理的"框架指令",明确了垃圾管理对策应遵循优先次序原则,即预防垃圾的产生、重复使用、循环利用</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>包含厨余垃圾的生化处理</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>优先于垃圾焚烧和填埋。这意味着无论从污染控制、能源节约,还是资源利用的角度,焚烧与填埋都是较差的选项。虽然至今为止,欧洲的垃圾焚烧厂还很多,焚烧减量的任务还很重,但优先次序原则的确定为欧洲未来通往"零废弃"的道路奠定了法律基础。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,欧盟委员会又发布了"欧洲资源效率路线图",提出要在</span><span lang=EN-US>2020</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年以前停止将可回收和可堆肥废弃物送入焚烧厂,并建议垃圾管理的资金支持也应遵循优先次序原则,即在循环利用一端加大投入而不是末端处理。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>丹麦和法国是欧洲垃圾焚烧比率最高的两个国家,都达到了</span><span lang=EN-US>50%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>左右。但近期两国的政府内阁成员都先后发表了她们积极推动减少焚烧的政策立场。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,丹麦时任环境部长提出丹麦要循环利用更多,焚烧更少。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,法国环境部长也表示焚烧是过时技术,在废弃物收集和能源转化方面,许多技术都比垃圾焚烧环保且合理得多,所以必须通过强制手段来停止焚烧垃圾。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>如今,许多人都知道污染物的环境容量是有限的,所以大量焚烧垃圾的社会终究是不可持续的。至于焚烧的限度究竟该划到哪,不仅是欧洲人已经在思考的问题,也应引起国人的重视。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>之前本文已经讨论过我国垃圾焚烧厂二噁英和汞污染的情况,如果进一步从环境容量的角度考虑,情况更令人堪忧。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>参照我国目前的环评技术标准,大气中二噁英浓度的上限是</span><span lang=EN-US>0.6pg TEQ/m3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,由此可以认为任何在此背景下的额外排放都是不可接受的。而现实是,在北京、上海、广州、杭州等大城市,大气环境中的二噁英已经逼近、甚至超出了这个上限。虽然已经存在的二噁英污染并不都是垃圾焚烧所致,但在环境容量已趋饱和或已经饱和的状态下,任何新增污染源都会增加人们的健康风险。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>同样出于环境容量及污染物环境持久性特征的考虑,现有的国际公约和国家法规都明确要求限制垃圾焚烧特征污染物二噁英和汞的排放。《斯德哥尔摩公约》要求,垃圾焚烧作为重点行业,其二噁英排放应该逐步减少并最大限度的消除</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>为此,垃圾管理应该优先采取不形成和不排放二噁英的技术措施。《重金属污染综合防治"十二五"规划》也设置了这样的目标:到"十二五"末,</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个重点省份</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>包含广东、江苏、浙江等垃圾焚烧大省</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>的汞排放相比</span><span lang=EN-US>2007</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年降低</span><span lang=EN-US>15%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,其他省份不超过</span><span lang=EN-US>2007</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年水平。考虑到目前焚烧行业汞污染的现实情况,新增焚烧厂及其汞排放将恶化全国重金属污染防治的总体形势。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>环境容量的限制不仅出现在全国、乃至地区性的范围内,也适用于局部地方。环保组织调查发现,在垃圾焚烧厂的环评报告中,环评单位经常不按技术导则规定,将新增污染叠加于环境本底以预测环境变化,这种"疏忽"的客观结果就是严重淡化新污染源给周围环境带来的冲击。事实上,不论是高毒性的特征污染物,如二噁英、汞,还是常规污染物,如大气颗粒物、氮氧化物、一氧化碳、二氧化硫,许多被环评的地方都已无什么环境容量可言,任何新增污染,都将继续恶化当地的环境和公共健康安全。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>参照发达国家的经验,焚烧厂污染问题的控制的确可以通过高资金和高技术的投入实现,不然这些地方的公众也不会轻易允许焚烧厂的建设运行。但这样的做法只是将污染问题进行了转化,其结果就是温室气体排放的增加,加剧气候变化。以二噁英问题为例,要最大限度地消除大气排放,一方面要实现垃圾的彻底燃烧以及急速降温,结果意味着焚烧厂不仅需要补充更多辅助燃料,还要牺牲产能的利用</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>另一方面,烟气越是净化,飞灰中的二噁英浓度越高,其二次处理仍要耗费大量能源。在日本,飞灰无害化处理的方向是高温熔融,进而制成稳定的玻璃体,这种过程实则是将焚烧厂的污染问题转化成了气候变化问题而已。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>最终,无论是焚烧垃圾本身产生的温室气体排放,还是二次污染控制引发的温室气体排放,合起来都将使业已超常的大气温室气体水平继续攀高。而根据最近国内环保组织发布的政策建议,基于垃圾分类的非焚烧处理技术的气候变化影响可以小至焚烧发电的八分之一,在我们的前方的确有更好的低碳发展道路。</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>三、转型阶段的初步建议</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>尽管垃圾管理的未来并不属于垃圾焚烧,但垃圾围城、垃圾围村的现实困境是必须面对的,许多建成垃圾焚烧厂的运营也不能回避。摆在政府和公众眼前的真实课题是如何减轻现有焚烧厂的环境影响和健康伤害,以及如何达成共识切实向"零废弃"的理想一步步迈进。有如下几点建议供各方参考:</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>政府部门立即对全国所有垃圾焚烧厂开展全面、彻底"体检",尤其要查找出那些已经被曝光过的焚烧厂出现问题的原因,并督促整改。"体检"过程当然必须要透明、公开,这样既有利于提升焚烧厂运营水平,又有利于公众理性认知焚烧厂风险,并反求自身参与行动的可能性</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>政府部门需研究建立行之有效的焚烧厂违法、违规的追责机制。短期内,公众对焚烧项目的反对,都源自于对焚烧厂风险的担忧。政府除了通过提高焚烧厂运营和污染控制水平外,向公众作出可以兑现的"意外保障",才能够切实降低公众积蓄已久的不信任感</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>政府部门应取消对垃圾焚烧行业不合理的政策支持。如果从政府提供公共服务的角度考虑,应该学习欧盟,明确垃圾管理对策优先次序原则,并出台相应的具体措施促进垃圾源头减量、物品重复使用,以及可回收物和厨余有机物的循环利用。相关措施可优先考虑体现在垃圾管理的五年规划、循环经济促进法的落实、垃圾处理技术政策、地方法规等制度修订上。如果从政府管理行业的角度考虑,应该在坚守自身监管职责的基础上,将焚烧产业真正推向市场,去除补贴和激励政策,由市场决定其发展走向</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>各地政府和公众,尤其是垃圾管理部门和特别关注垃圾问题的市民最好互相主动联络、沟通,一起研究、探讨本地中长期,例如</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>至</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年时间内,垃圾填埋和焚烧处理的减量目标,以及按阶段、分步骤逐渐实施的具体行动方案、时间表和各方职责。只有直面危机、达成共识、共同行动,垃圾管理才能走出十年原地踏步的困境</span><span lang=EN-US>;</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>民间环保组织或公益组织肯定应该发挥倡导新方向、沟通社会各方意见、促进行动共识的作用。目前,除了继续坚持公众宣传教育、减量和分类试点探索等工作外,实在不可再躲避垃圾焚烧产生的种种环境和社会问题,只有更好地监督垃圾焚烧,促使其真实代价的完整显现,才能为更理想的垃圾管理体系赢得宽广的未来。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>来源:改革内参</span><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>作者:毛达</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-70263327530598055632015-10-13T01:32:00.001-07:002015-10-13T01:32:57.783-07:00扬州一鱼塘现大量畸形鱼 距化工厂仅几十米<p class="mobile-photo"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjewPKIPkh8WOOHt85rydi-d9268s96ZoN6Z_K8xnc0BdBKqZhi78xMKlmxkw_Sk5AOc6l96HZODywEDyZJDUuugYqixgQhNQN4cpJmQ5nKpd7JWoyymSsWzVl9XQ6qZmTrj0US1rlyt4e/s1600/%253D%253Futf-8%253FB%253F5oms5bee6auY6YKu5biC5YW75q6W5oi3LmpwZw%253D%253D%253F%253D-777783"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjewPKIPkh8WOOHt85rydi-d9268s96ZoN6Z_K8xnc0BdBKqZhi78xMKlmxkw_Sk5AOc6l96HZODywEDyZJDUuugYqixgQhNQN4cpJmQ5nKpd7JWoyymSsWzVl9XQ6qZmTrj0US1rlyt4e/s320/%253D%253Futf-8%253FB%253F5oms5bee6auY6YKu5biC5YW75q6W5oi3LmpwZw%253D%253D%253F%253D-777783" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_6205047399132707938" /></a></p><div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>2015-10-13 03:08:53</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'> 来源</span><span lang=EN-US>: </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>现代快报</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>最近,扬州高邮市养殖户耿冠宝遇到了蹊跷事,鱼塘里打上来的鱼,多半都有些畸形。而距离鱼塘几十米远有一家化工厂,不久前发生过有毒气体泄漏事故。耿冠宝怀疑这家化工厂就是酿成畸形鱼的罪魁祸首。目前,高邮市环保局及当地水产部门已介入调查,环保部门初步推测,畸形鱼可能受到某种物质的污染。昨天,高邮环保局已至现场取样,具体的情况还有待进一步检测结果。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>蹊跷</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>他养的鱼不是尾巴秃,就是鱼骨弯了</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据了解,事发鱼塘位于高邮市卸甲镇境内,总面积约</span><span lang=EN-US>70</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亩,承包者是耿冠宝的父亲。"我们家是前年秋天承包的鱼塘,当时也没发现有什么异常。"耿冠宝介绍,早在</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年秋天,他们一家将鱼塘承包下来,并投放鱼苗进行养殖。去年秋天及今年初,曾先后捕捞过两次,其间发现有个别鱼出现鱼鳃萎缩的情况,但他们以为是正常情况,并未当回事。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>耿冠宝介绍,今年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月初,鱼塘内出现大批死鱼,他和父亲将死鱼打捞上来查看发现,这些鱼长得奇形怪状,"不是尾巴秃,就是鱼骨弯了,甚至有些鱼眼睛、腮等部位肿得不像样",而这样的情况,此前从未遇到过。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>耿冠宝向现代快报记者提供的照片证实了上述说法,照片中的畸形鱼数量较大,且情况严重,部分鱼连鱼尾和鱼鳍都没有了。耿冠宝说,自事发至今,死鱼的数量也不断增加,"父亲这两天常做的工作就是从塘内捞死鱼"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>探因</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>鱼塘附近有家化工厂,曾发生泄漏事故</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>养殖的鱼大量畸形,且不断死亡,耿冠宝开始寻找原因。据了解,鱼塘不远处就是高邮光明化工厂,两者间仅隔了一条沟,距离不足百米。就在事发前不久,光明化工厂还发生过气体泄漏事故,这家化工厂成了耿冠宝怀疑对象。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日的时候,当时发生爆炸,有气体泄漏,我们都闻到刺鼻的气味了。"耿冠宝回忆,气体泄漏发生在</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,当天化工厂四周弥漫着一股刺鼻的气味,大量酸雾从管道中外泄。此后不久,鱼塘边的大豆等作物就开始发黄、枯萎,紧接着鱼塘也开始出现死鱼。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对此,高邮光明化工厂一叶姓负责人在接受媒体采访时承认气体泄漏一事,但该负责人表示,气体泄漏发生后被及时控制,否认是此次泄漏造成了鱼体畸形。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据耿冠宝介绍,畸形鱼、死鱼情况发生后,他们曾找到高邮光明化工厂讨说法,当地村委会也介入调解。"化工厂起先说要承担损失,把我们的死鱼都拉到厂里过磅了,但后来又不肯赔,说跟他们没关系。"耿冠宝称。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"我们家还有一个鱼塘,也在这附近,但距离化工厂比较远,至少</span><span lang=EN-US>200</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米以外。那个塘子就没有发现畸形鱼,两个塘子用的是同一批苗种,不可能是鱼苗的问题。"耿冠宝表示。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>进展</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>环保、水产等部门介入调查</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"我们去看过,初步调查来看,应该是受到了某种物质的污染,不像是鱼病。"高邮水产站董姓负责人表示,从死鱼及畸形鱼情况来看,应该不是鱼病,初步推测为受污染所致。高邮环保局一工作人员也向现代快报记者表示,尽管造成鱼畸形、死亡的原因很多,但从现场情况来看,初步怀疑耿冠宝家的畸形鱼是受到重金属污染所致。</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日下午,高邮环保局已到现场对涉事鱼塘进行取样。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据高邮农委一吴姓工作人员介绍,事发后,农委渔政部门也派人到现场查看,"当时推测为污染导致的,但这个定性需要检测"。该工作人员称,目前,高邮环保部门也介入调查,并对水体取样检测。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>畸形鱼究竟是何因所致,还要等待进一步调查。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>这么多的畸形鱼</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该怎么处理?</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>鱼塘里出现大量畸形鱼,对于养殖户来说,将是一大损失。但更令人担忧的是,如果这些畸形鱼流入市场,是否会造成更大的影响?"暂时是不可能让这些鱼流入市场的,他们家人也比较配合。"高邮农委一位工作人员表示,鱼塘中养殖的鱼出现严重畸形,可能存在影响人类健康的元素。也正因此,该人员表示,在具体原因探明之前,将禁止这些鱼流入市场。另外,耿冠宝也向记者明确称,在事实没清楚之前,不会将这些鱼出售。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-15970940610771937512015-10-12T08:43:00.001-07:002015-10-12T08:43:59.807-07:00Worried about the health effects of China’s out-of-control pollution, citizens are starting to take action.<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>October 09, 2015 By Jennifer Duggan</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Jennifer Duggan is an Irish journalist until very recently based in Shanghai. Her reporting has appeared in The Guardian, The Scotsman, Al-Jazeera, and Irish Independent.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Sometimes in the middle of the night, a pungent odor permeates the suburb of Asuwei, outside Beijing. A chemical tang mixed with the rotten smell of garbage, it can be so strong that it awakens Hu Jun from her slumber. She says that when the wind blows in a certain direction, she knows the smell is coming and closes the windows before going to bed. But it still gets in. "I can smell it when I'm asleep. It comes through the cracks. It can permeate the room and wakes me up," says Hu, a university professor in her late 50s. (Her name has been changed, as speaking negatively about the government in China can result in harassment, persecution, or imprisonment.)</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Asuwei is past the end of Beijing's sprawling subway line, where the city meets the countryside, close to a river and a hot spring resort. The stench comes from an overflowing nearby landfill; opened in 1996, it has grown with the Chinese capital's population and wealth to exceed capacity. Hu knew about the landfill when she left the city center a decade ago but believed the upmarket development of neat houses with tidy lawns where she was making her new home would be a quiet, idyllic place to live. But soon residents were complaining about the garbage smell, and five years ago, the local government installed giant chemical-spraying guns, a kind of enormous version of a Febreze air freshener. But instead of solving the problem, the putative deodorizers created another. Hu says that now she can almost taste the chemicals in the air. "It is not merely a bad smell; it is a smell that is a mix of the chemicals and the garbage."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Beijing now produces almost 15 billion pounds of municipal household waste each year; the landfill at Asuwei receives 7.2 million pounds. In an effort to deal with the growing amount of trash generated by China's expanding middle class and increasingly consumerist society, Beijing and other cities are building huge incinerators—including one close to the landfill in Asuwei. Hu is worried; once fully operational, the new incinerator will reportedly burn 6 million pounds of garbage a day. Environmental authorities have said the project passed the required assessments, but Hu and other residents are mistrustful, fearing the emissions that will come from the plant. "The environment cannot tolerate it, and our health would be at risk," she says. She maintains that everyone in the area is against the incinerator, though only a few—including Hu—are taking action, organizing and participating in public protests. She spends a lot of time reading and analyzing reports and environmental assessments, trying to find a way to stop the incinerator from opening.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>China's leaders appear fearful that the many, small localized bands of discontented citizens like Hu will coalesce into a larger movement; it now spends more money on internal security, which includes managing and suppressing these protests, than it does on its military. The unification of what are now disconnected grassroots actions against specific pollution sources into a national environmental movement is perceived as a threat to the rule of the Communist Party. The Internet, used by activists and protesters as a tool for sharing information, is often quickly scrubbed of evidence of any protest actions or criticism of the government. Earlier this year, a documentary film on China's environmental ills received hundreds of millions of hits in just one week before being taken down by government censors, presumably out of fear that it could become China's Silent Spring moment, sparking a nationwide outcry. At the same time, citizens are fearful too—of the rash of toxins that threaten their lives, and of the government that has shown it is willing to punish those who dare complain about the threat. Nevertheless, complaining they are, in increasing numbers and with increasing boldness—and impact.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Over a traditional lunch of shared dishes, Hu explains her motivation. "Our main disagreement is that the government believes the pollution can be under control, but we don't," she says, getting animated and waving her chopsticks. "The government said they could control the pollution in the landfill, but the stinky air is constantly there. I'm told the landfills in the U.S. don't have any smell at all. Golf courses, parks, and cafés are right around them. But our government doesn't have good management ability. It's actually a public trust issue."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>A gallery of environmental pollution in China.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>1 / 10</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Smog over Shanghai. Despite Beijing's reputation for poor air quality, the city is not in the top 10 of China's most polluted cities. (Photo: Flickr)</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Such fears seemed to be confirmed on the night of Aug. 12, when a series of explosions at a chemical warehouse rocked the port city of Tianjin, 75 miles from Beijing. Cell-phone video broadcast around the world recorded a fiery red ball exploding from a building, a flash, and then a massive bang as a second, even bigger fireball engulfed the sky. More than 150 people were killed.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Criticism and anger have since been expressed across China, with users on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform similar to Twitter, questioning how hazardous chemicals could be stored so close to residential areas in violation of national safety standards; facilities with hazardous chemicals are forbidden from operating less than one kilometer from residential and public buildings, though it's not clear whether the warehouse owner will face fines or criminal penalties. Residents whose homes were destroyed in the blast also took part in protests, demanding compensation. The warehouse that exploded was found to have been holding 40 types of chemicals, which according to state media included 700 tons of sodium cyanide, 800 tons of ammonium nitrate (the fertilizer used in the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing of 1995), and 500 tons of potassium nitrate. Residents fear pollution in the area since the explosion, and reports surfaced of chemical rain falling afterward and thousands of dead fish washing up nearby.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>The outrage expressed around the Tianjin disaster reflects significant and growing concern about the state of the environment and pollution caused by the country's coal-fired power plants and industrial operations. According to a Pew Research Center poll published in September, air pollution and water pollution are Nos. 2 and 3 on the list of Chinese citizens' top concerns. (No. 1—corruption—is itself linked to pollution, as those in a position to do something about it have connections to industry, and if air and water pollution are counted together they dwarf corruption as the chief concern). Air pollution is a visible and highly publicized problem, and the burgeoning middle classes, well educated and with newfound leisure time, are becoming increasingly upset and outspoken about toxic water and soil. Last year, almost 90 percent of China's biggest cities failed to meet air-quality standards, according to the Ministry of Environmental Protection (even as emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide fell slightly, the ministry reported in September). Despite gaining worldwide attention for its "airpocalypses," when pollution levels have reached 755 on a scale of 500, Beijing isn't even in the top 10 of China's most polluted cities. While emissions from coal-fired power stations cause choking air above, polluting factories leak chemical-laden wastewater, poisoning rivers and farms. Only recently did the full scale of China's environmental degradation come to light: After years of keeping the results of a soil pollution survey a state secret, the Ministry of Environmental Protection in 2014 admitted that almost 20 percent of the country's farmland is polluted, mostly with toxic heavy metals from heavy industry and petrochemicals from intensive agriculture. Nearly 60 percent of groundwater is polluted. A study published in the scientific journal PLOS One in August estimated that air pollution contributes to the deaths of as many as 1.6 million people in China each year.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Pollution is something that affects everyone. It can easily gather the whole village, town, or city onto the streets.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>- Lu Yuyu, an activist who documents political protests in China</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>People are now making their voices heard in the form of protests, mostly against site-specific issues such as incinerators or chemical plants. Hu has written to authorities expressing concern about the Asuwei incinerator and in September 2009 took part with around 100 of her neighbors in a protest against it. Hu is smartly dressed, with jewelry and fashionable dark-rimmed glasses. She was at the vanguard of a new class of protesters—well-informed citizens concerned for their health and their families' future. When construction plans were delayed soon after they first protested, some thought their actions may have had an effect, but blueprints for the incinerator were later revived—it would now be double the size originally planned. Residents say they weren't consulted; the first they heard about it was when an environment assessment paper was published. "We started to fight against it again," says Hu. Construction has begun anyway.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Maya Wang, a researcher on China at Human Rights Watch, says that although these protests focus on local issues, they are connected to the bigger environmental problems facing the nation. "Chinese people in general are more concerned about pollution. In big cities in particular there have been large scale protests, often because the environmental pollution in China has increased quite dramatically," she says.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>RELATED: U.S. Smog: Made in Chinese Factories, Funded by American Consumers</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Protests have been growing in number and size over the past decade. According to Yang Zhaofei, vice-chair of the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, a Beijing-based NGO, the number of environmental protests has increased by an average of 29 percent every year since 1996; in 2011 the number of major demonstrations rose 120 percent.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Lu Yuyu runs a website that tracks protests in China using search engines and information gathered from social media and also sees the number of environmental protests rising drastically. Lu tracks all types of demonstrations, but, he says, "protests about environment and pollution are increasing not only in number but also in scale. Environmental protests are seen across the country in every province, in both cities and the remote countryside."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>The government appears worried. The first year China spent more on internal security than on military defense was 2011; the gap widened over the next two years, and in 2014 Beijing stopped reporting the numbers separately. Official figures put the number of "mass incidents"—protests over corruption, abuse of power, pollution, and other issues—as having risen more than tenfold between 1993 and 2010. Beijing has also since stopped reporting those figures.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Lu says one thing he's noticed over years of tracking public protests and demonstrations is that environmental protests "are usually by far the largest." They're also the ones that see the most violent crackdowns. "Pollution is something that affects everyone," he says. "It can easily gather the whole village, town, or city onto the streets."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Demonstrators hold banners with slogans on June 23, 2015, to protest against a chemical plant rumored to be built in the Shanghai suburb of Jinshan. Proposals for facilities where paraxylene, used to make plastics and polyester, is to be made have sparked large protests in several other Chinese cities in recent years, as they are often perceived as a poorly regulated health risk. (Photo: Getty Images)</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Hu is cautious when discussing the protest she took part in, outside the Agricultural Exhibition Center in the center of Beijing, where she and her fellow demonstrators unfurled banners calling for the incinerator project to be scrapped. Such acts are controversial in society and therefore a sensitive topic for Chinese. She says local authorities and the Beijing government opposed the action—a polite way of saying there was retribution. According to media reports at the time, the protest was deemed illegal and broken up by police; five protesters were arrested and detained.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Incinerators are a particular flash point of public opposition. So are chemical plants, particularly those producing paraxylene (PX), which is used in the manufacturing of plastic and polyester. People living nearby worry about cancer, asthma, and local water and soil quality—doubtful, as Hu is, that the facilities will be run properly and that potentially toxic emissions will be kept within safe limits.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>In June, a series of large-scale protests took place in Jinshan, a suburb of Shanghai, just on the rumor that a PX plant was to open in the vicinity. The local government issued assurances that there would be no such plant, but according to Chen Liwen, an environmental activist, few people believe such statements. "The local government tell the people there are plans for a park or a temple and after they get the land they change the land use," she says.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Thousands took to the streets. Protests continued for more than a week; many came out several days in a row. Local and national media, controlled by the state, are thought to have been ordered not to report on the protests, as few news stories about them surfaced in China—only the local government's official statements—and a camera operator for an international news outlet was blocked by police from filming. However, photos and video circulated widely on social media before they were deleted, presumably by censors. Photos showed protesters filling four lanes of a highway. Some wore symbolic face masks; others carried banners reading, "Give us back our Jinshan," "No to PX," and "Protect the environment." Around 40,000 people took part, according to one report. A small number of protesters managed to get to the municipal government offices in the center of Shanghai but were hauled away after scuffles with police.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Environmental activist Chen Liwen. (Photo: Nathan Gates)</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>One protester, who did not want to be named, said by WeChat, a messaging app popular in China, that a number of chemical plants are already in Jinshan, and many feel the emissions are a problem. She said locals are worried about their health, as a lot of people in the area suffer from cancer. "Our main request in this protest is asking the government to stop building new chemical factories; do not expand the chemical area in Jinshan," she said. "The chemical factories are swallowing our living space and emit poisonous air." One statistic widely circulated in China puts the rise in lung cancer deaths over the past 30 years at 465 percent. "People are concerned about their health, particularly from heavy metals and dioxins from emissions," says Chen.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Hu says she has suffered respiratory illnesses a few times a year ever since the chemical sprays began. "It starts with a cough, then fever," she says, touching her throat. "One time I was in the hospital for several days. The doctors asked me if I do some kind of job that exposes me to dust." Hu can't prove her illnesses are linked to the landfill and the deodorizing chemicals but says many others in the area have also fallen ill. "The landfill has had a great impact on nearby residents' health," she says. "Most of the diseases are related to air or water pollution. With the incinerator there will be two pollution sources."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> </span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>The Shocking Number of People Dying Daily From China's Air Pollution</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>For many years, the focus for China's citizens has been to increase wages and living standards. Hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty, but the country's industrialization has taken a tremendous toll on the environment. Ironically, the huge increase in disposable income has expanded health consciousness and spurred a growing awareness of those ecological ills. In big cities like Beijing and Shanghai, sales of air purifiers and face masks are booming, as are sales of organic and imported food and bottled water as people try to ensure safe food and water and clean air for their families.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>These worries were both confirmed and animated earlier this year when the documentary film Under the Dome, researched and presented by a popular former television news anchor, Chai Jing, went viral and gave encouragement to environmentalists and momentum to their cause. Chai, who lives in Beijing, took a stark look at air pollution's sources and effects. She tells the story of how her daughter was born with a benign tumor. While she doesn't link her daughter's condition with air pollution, she says the experience made her aware and "afraid" of pollution, reflecting the fears of parents in cities throughout the country. In one scene, Chai asks a young girl in Shaanxi province, China's coal heartland, if she has ever seen stars. "No," the girl replies. Chai asks if she has seen blue sky. "Slightly blue sky" is the answer. Chai asks if the girl has ever seen white clouds; the girl says, "No."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Watch the banned documentary Under the Dome.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>The minister of environmental protection, Chen Jining, initially praised the documentary, and within days it had been viewed and shared online hundreds of millions of times, blowing up on social media and messaging apps like WeChat. Ma Jun, China's best-known environmentalist, described the documentary as "one of the most important pieces of public awareness of all time by the Chinese media." But Under the Dome proved to be a little too popular, and just over a week after its release it was removed from Chinese websites.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Protests like the ones in Jinshan are almost always focused on a particular plant or project. Though significant because the concerns are real and direct—a persistent cough, a daughter's asthma, a river that no longer produces fish—they are essentially NIMBYish in nature. There is no organized network attempting to address environmental policy at a national level. Protesters to this point, says Daniel K. Gardner, professor of history at Smith College, "are not saying, 'Down with the government.' They are saying there has been no environmental assessment or consultation with the public, and the government promised that. And they want the government to do something about it."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>The Chinese government is well aware that the environment can be part of a broader social movement for change.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>- Elizabeth Economy, Council on Foreign Relations</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Under the Dome may have changed that. Gardner, who is writing a book on environmental pollution in China, says that while the government admits that pollution is a real problem—state media reported in August that legislators concerned about water pollution "grilled" members of the cabinet, who promised to address it—the popularity of Chai's film made officials nervous. "Now there was the possibility of some sort of organized movement," he says. "Chai Jing galvanized what is already an awareness, and that is what the government is afraid of, this galvanization of the public." </span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>China's environmental ills are now high on Beijing's agenda, with Premier Li Keqiang, in March, going as far as to say the government was "declaring war on pollution." He further declared the government was "determined" to tackle smog and environmental pollution, admitting that the progress made so far "falls far short of the expectation of the people."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>The government knows that a widespread environmental movement could lead to the development of an organized civil society and sees this as a threat to the power of the Communist Party. "If you look at some of the former republics of the Soviet Union or countries in Eastern Europe before the fall of the Berlin Wall, or other countries in Asia," says Elizabeth Economy, director for Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, "you find that in a number of cases, an environmental issue was the trigger or a contributing factor to the social discontent in large-scale protests and the eventual overthrow of the government. The Chinese government is well aware that the environment can be part of a broader social movement for change."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Protests are kept local both by officials' sometimes giving in to the demands of protesters or portraying them as motivated purely by self-interest. "Some of these protests have been quite successful, but none has coalesced into pressure on the government to engage [or] to change the abuse of power and corruption that lead to these environmental problems," says Wang of Human Rights Watch. "The government have been good at ensuring that these do not spread beyond the local areas that they occur in, [even though] these issues are remarkably similar across the country." </span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>sign up for the takepart features email</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Add context and dimension to the issues you care about with personal stories and gripping long form narratives reported from the inside of where news is happening.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Your Email</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US> submit</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>By submitting the form above, you agree to TakePart's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at any time. Contact us here.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>While some environmental protests appear to be tolerated and at times can be successful in their aims at getting plans for a plant delayed or cancelled, in general protests are not welcomed and can be put down by the authorities. To keep a protest from spreading, local authorities try to stop the flow of information. Chinese media are squelched, and censors delete information shared on social media. While a public action is taking place, mobile communications can be cut (there were reports of this happening during the protests in Jinshan).</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>During the reporting of this article, I tried, using WeChat and Weibo to make contact with a number of protesters who had been involved with the demonstrations in Jinshan. Most were reluctant to talk, especially on WeChat, perhaps because of reports that the app is monitored. Months afterward, it was still difficult to talk to anyone who took part. One woman who had posted a lot of information and photos on social media during the protests had seemed eager to talk. We exchanged messages over a number of weeks, and she invited me to Jinshan to show me the chemical plants.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>A few days before we were to meet, though, she stopped replying to messages. Another protester, who had agreed to talk by telephone, also stopped responding. While I can't know for sure why these individuals shut down our correspondence, it seems likely—as other sources have expressed similar concerns to me and other journalists here—that they were worried about the consequences of talking to a foreign journalist about protests against the government. Wang of Human Rights Watch says it is likely there have been some repercussions for those involved in the Jinshan protests, especially as civil society and activism across all areas—from labor to freedom of speech to ethnic autonomy to religious rights—have seen crackdowns in the last couple of years. "It's quite common to expect that the authorities take measures that have to do with intimidation and harassment of people who were involved in [the Jinshan protests]," Wang tells me when I ask her why she thinks these sources might have gone silent. "From NGOs to activists to the participants of these protests, the amount of pressure has generally increased."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Chen Liwen echoes this sentiment, saying it has become riskier for people to take part in protests in recent years. "It is more and more dangerous than before. Because the control in China is very strict, after the protest the police will find out the organizer and they will detain them," she says.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>As if to prove Chen's point, the night before I was to meet with an environmental activist, the source received a phone call warning her not to meet with me. The caller knew the time and place of our meeting, which had been arranged over email. We made alternate plans, but the day after we met she received a visit from two men believed to be public security officers, wanting to know what we had discussed. A military parade—for which the government slowed or ceased operation of more than 12,000 power plants, factories, and cement plants in the region to ensure blue skies—commemorating the end of World War II was to take place the following week, and activists frequently come under increased pressure and surveillance before such official spectacles.</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Despite potential consequences, Hu has not ruled out organizing or protesting against the incinerator in Asuwei now that it isunder construction. She sighs heavily at the suggestion, indicating it is not something she wants. "It's still a long way to go," she says. In the meantime she is trying to fight by legal and administrative means. She and her neighbors have consulted experts and activists on strategy. "It's very tough," she says. "I need to read a lot of paperwork. It's a learning process." Nevertheless, she's not giving up. "This is for the common good. So I'm not afraid of anything."</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-128127623953352322015-10-12T08:42:00.001-07:002015-10-12T08:42:53.998-07:00广东上千村民因抗议垃圾焚烧厂污染环境,与警方激烈冲突<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据海外的博讯网报道,</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日连续两天,广东省阳春市春湾镇自由管理区村民为抗议海螺水泥厂私自在村内建垃圾焚烧场发电,堵路禁垃圾车通过。愤怒民众与海螺公司请来的大批保安发生冲突,当地公安躲在水泥厂里没敢出来。期间有警车被掀翻、被烧毁。双方都有人受伤,有多名村民被抓,有村民形容这是一场现代小型的农民起义。当地出动大批特警,村民才撤离。当地人呼吁社会、媒体关注,不然发生新的冲突将可能出很多人命。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本台记者接通了春湾镇自由管理区村民王女士的电话,向她查证这一消息:</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者:这两天你们村的村民因为抗议垃圾焚烧厂和警察发生冲突,有这件事吗?</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>王女士:有,具体情况我不清楚。但是我坚决反对垃圾焚烧厂的建设,而且,建厂计划事先没有征求村民意见。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>目击村民"修炼阶段中"发帖说:今天</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多人聚集阳春海螺门前,反对阳春海螺建设焚烧场!</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>现场图片以及视频显示,大量手持红旗、棍棒的村民与大量警察在水泥厂门口发生激烈冲突,期间警察向村民施放了大量催泪弹,现场浓烟滚滚,一片狼籍。现场有多辆警车、货车等被烧毁或正在燃烧,一些村民、警察倒在地上。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据村民透露,冲突中至少有</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名村民遭到抓捕,并有多人受伤。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>江苏无锡的环保人士吴立红说,垃圾焚烧厂的建设在中国各地都引起了抗议:</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"村民的担心是有原因的,因为垃圾焚烧过程中产生的二恶英气体有毒,是致癌物质,焚烧垃圾不仅污染空气,也可能导致其他污染。"</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吴立红说,他所在地附近的常州的一个村庄十几年前建了一个垃圾填埋厂,结果给当地村民带来灾难性后果:</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"当地的水土遭到严重污染,河里鱼虾死亡,连村里的树木也是枯黄,更不用说庄稼了,村里民众多年上访,没有任何结果。"</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吴立红说,垃圾焚烧有污染,填埋也有污染,现在中国垃圾围城,应该有一个新的思路,是否应该从垃圾的源头想办法,比如通过回收来减少垃圾数量:</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"日本等国家在回收垃圾方面有经验,中国现在垃圾不分类回收,金属垃圾和餐厨垃圾混杂在一起焚烧,其实金属垃圾可以回收,餐厨垃圾也可以沤肥,再次利用。"</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>报道说,目击村民"怪叔叔窝窝头"发帖说:阳春市春湾镇自由海螺水泥厂门口,官兵来镇压村民,发生冲突,官兵向村民投放催泪弹。来了挺多警察的,还拦住路口,不让记者来釆访,记者不敢来,打伤了几个群众,抓了十个群众。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>冲突一直持续至当天下午,再有大批警察到达事发现场镇压村民。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-60911821198830540562015-10-07T09:53:00.001-07:002015-10-07T09:53:56.752-07:00环境维权-中阳县人民检察院寻衅滋事罪刑事判决书<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公诉机关中阳县人民检察院。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人任某,农民。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日因涉嫌寻衅滋事罪被中阳县公安局刑事拘留,同年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>19</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日被逮捕。现羁押于中阳县看守所。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中阳县人民检察院以中检公诉刑诉(</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>29</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号起诉书指控被告人任某犯寻衅滋事罪向本院提起公诉。本院受理后,依法组成合议庭,公开开庭审理了本案。中阳县人民检察院指派检察员何斐出庭支持公诉,被告人任某到庭参加诉讼。现已审理终结。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公诉机关指控,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年至</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,被告人任某多次在吕梁市委、中阳县委多次非正常上访,无故辱骂拦截他人,并在被劝阻时持木棍殴打执勤民警及保安人员。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏季的一天,被告人任某在中阳县县委主楼,阻拦县委副书记阴大瑞进楼上班,值班保安张某、卫世文上前劝阻,被告人任某持随身携带的木棍殴打张、卫二人。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许,被告人任某欲强行闯入吕梁市信访局会场,值班民警韩某劝阻,任即持随身携带的木棍殴打韩某。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分许,被告人任某在中阳县委主楼阻拦县委书记郭保平出行,值班保安张某、谢小旭分别上前制止时,任持随身携带的木棍先后对张、谢二人殴打。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日上午</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许,被告人任某在吕梁市委大院谩骂领导,并欲阻拦纪委书记雷建国出行,值班民警白某乙上前劝阻,任即用随身携带的木棍对白进行殴打,致白某乙鼻骨骨折。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>为证实上述事实,公诉机关提供有报案材料、被告人任某的供述、证人证言、诊断证明、视频资料、到案经过、户籍证明等证据。公诉机关认为,被告人任某的行为构成寻衅滋事罪,提请本院依法判处。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人任某辩称其并没持木棍殴打人,对其余指控的基本犯罪事实予以供认。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>经审理查明,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年至</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,被告人任某多次在吕梁市委、中阳县委多次非正常上访,无故辱骂拦截他人,并在被劝阻时持木棍殴打执勤民警及保安人员。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏季的一天,被告人任某在中阳县县委主楼,阻拦县委副书记阴大瑞进楼上班,值班保安张某、卫世文上前劝阻,被告人任某持随身携带的木棍殴打张、卫二人。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许,被告人任某欲强行闯入吕梁市信访局会场,值班民警韩某劝阻,任即持随身携带的木棍殴打韩某。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分许,被告人任某在中阳县委主楼阻拦县委书记郭保平出行,值班保安张某、谢小旭分别上前制止时,任持随身携带的木棍先后对张、谢二人殴打。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日上午</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许,被告人任某在吕梁市委大院谩骂领导,并阻拦纪委书记雷建国出行,值班民警白某乙上前劝阻,任即用随身携带的木棍对白进行殴打,致白某乙鼻骨骨折。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证实上述事实的证据有</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>受案登记表及离石区公安局驻市委大院信访依法处置工作室报案材料及给中阳县信访局、公安局出具的材料,证实任某在近两三年多次到市委大院常委楼前非访,去了就骂天骂地,大叫大喊、辱骂市委领导。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份的一个下午,任某在吕梁市信访接待中心上访,辱骂接访人员,离石区公安局信访接待中心的公安执勤民警制止时,将执勤民警韩永胜打了两棍;</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>34</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某再次来到常委楼前闹事,口吐脏言,辱骂市委领导,离石区公安局执勤民警前去制止时,任用随身携带的木棍将执勤民警白某乙头部、鼻梁打伤,</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人王某的证言,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>34</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某来到常委楼前,大喊大叫,大骂市委领导,这时纪委雷建国书记刚走出大门准备上车走时,任某准备拦阻,白某乙前去制止,任某用手持的木棍在白某乙面部打了两棍,当即白某乙被打的鼻子流了血,两眼流泪,并证实近两三年来,任经常到市常委楼前大喊大叫,少时一天两次,多时一天五六次。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被害人白某乙的情况说明及陈述,证实其是离石区公安局驻市委大院特勤,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>34</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某来到市委大院内,大喊大叫,辱骂市委领导,其上前劝说,任某不听,反而大骂执勤人员。此时,市纪委书记雷建国要乘车离去,任某上前阻拦,其欲拉任时,任用手中的木棍朝其头部打来,打了两下,第一下打在头顶部,第二下打在鼻梁上,还用木棍在自己肩部捅了一下,其他工作人员将任拉到值班室控制,自己的鼻子流血,头晕目眩,诊断为鼻骨骨折。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人马某、贺某、赵某的证言,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某在市委大院大喊大骂,无理拦截欲乘车出行的市纪委书记的车辆,白某乙赶到现场劝阻,老头用手中的拐杖殴打白某乙,致白某乙鼻子流血。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人付某的证言,证实其负责吕梁市政府的上访人员处置工作,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某拄着一根棍子又叫又骂从信访大厅旁的小门进入市政府大院,直接到了市委常委办公楼前不停的叫骂,当时雷建国正下楼乘车出门,任某叫骂着挥舞着棍子要拦车,白某乙赶到现场劝阻,其赶到现场后,看见任某在地上躺着不停地叫骂,白某乙鼻子一直流血。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人赵某的证言,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时左右,其在市委楼前站岗,一个手拄木棍的老年人来到门口不停的大声叫骂,这时正好纪检书记下楼乘车准备出门,老年人挥舞着棍子要拦阻,白某乙把老年人从后面抱住,那个老年人用手中的木棍在白某乙右腿部打了一下后又用手中的木棍往身后的白某乙头部捅,捅了两下后看见白某乙鼻子流血。并证实经常看到这个老年人到市委上访,每次都大吵大闹。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人韩某、薛某、白某甲的证言,证实其三人均是离石区公安局驻市委信访办公室协警,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日下午</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许,其三人在门口值班,任某拿一根镢把站在大厅里大喊大叫,往外拉任某,任不肯出去,拿着镢把在其小腿部打了三四下,两个同事过来把他的镢把夺下,强行拉到外面。并证实任经常到市委大院,到处跑,大喊大骂,喊上一顿就走了。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人朱某的证言,证实其是中阳县委主办公楼门卫,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>点</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某拄着拐杖来到县委主办公楼,说要找领导硬往里闯,其和张雄将任某拦住让他站到门外边,一出门,任某就把手里的一个袋子和拐杖放到地上,解开裤子在办公楼前撒尿,之后拿着棍子和拐杖离开。</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日下午</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分许,任某在县委楼下拦县委书记的车,保安张某上前把任某拦住,任某拿手里的木棍就打了张某腿一下,后保安队长解某将任某拦住。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人张某的证言,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日下午</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>点</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分左右,任某在县委楼前,大声叫骂县委领导,后来见郭书记要坐车离开,就上前阻拦,其看见后劝阻,任某不但不停,拿手中的木棍打在其腿上,解某上前拉他,他又在解某的腿上打了三四下,木棍也被打断。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏天,任某在县委楼前门口大骂,要拦住阴书记不让上楼,后来其和卫某将任拉到信访大厅,任用手里的木棍打其和卫某。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人解某的证言,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日下午</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时左右,县委书记要乘车离去,车刚要走时,任某手拿木棍就朝书记车上冲,张某上前制止,任某手拿木棍在张的腿上就打,其赶紧跑过去,劝说任,任不听,拿起手里的木棍朝其左腿上打,第二下就把木棍打断。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏天的一天中午,任某拦住阴大瑞不让上楼,卫某和张某扶到信访局门口,二人回来告其任某用木棍打了他两下。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>证人卫某的证言,证实其于</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月至</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月在中阳县委做保安,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏天的一天,任某拦住阴大瑞书记,阴说有事到信访局,任不肯,其和张某劝说任,任不听,后二人将任抬到信访大厅,后其二人要离开时,任用手中的木棍打了张某几下。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人任某的供述,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,其在市委门口大声叫骂,执勤人员强行拉其并夺其手中的木棍,自己失手打了拉其的人的面部一棍;</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,其在中阳县委主楼前,堵住出门的郭保平书记,保安拉其时,其用手中的木棍打了保安两下,木棍打断;</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏天,中阳县委保安把其从县委大楼抬到信访局时,其用手里拄的棍子打过两个保安;</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日上午在在中阳县委主楼门口撒过尿。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中阳县信访局的情况说明,证实任某曾上访反映原建滔企业占地及环境污染等问题,该信访请求经镇、县、市三级调查处理终结,当事人已经不再反映此问题。现在无具体上访请求。近年来,任某频繁到县委缠访县领导,经常在县委楼前滞留谩骂、串游,频繁逗留信访局,严重影响了机关的工作秩序。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中阳县金罗镇政府关于任某无理取闹的情况说明,证实任某倚老卖老,经常跑在镇政府随意辱骂乡镇书记及镇长、机关工作人员,并且有时会拿拐杖随意打人,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月年关将近,任某更加频繁到到镇政府谩骂工作人员,镇领导劝阻无效,</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日又到市委楼前殴打协警,造成了恶劣的影响。并证实其上访诉求属无理取闹。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吕梁市人民医院诊断证明及</span><span lang=EN-US>X</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>线检查报告,证实受害人白某乙被诊断为鼻挫伤,右侧上颌窦囊肿,外伤后头晕。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中阳县公安局金罗派出所到案经过说明,证实该所接到报案后,在现场将任某口头传唤到金罗派出所接受讯问。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>前科劣迹调查表,证实</span><span lang=EN-US>2011</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,任某因涉嫌寻衅滋事罪被中阳县公安局刑事拘留。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>户籍证明,证实被告人任某已达刑事责任年龄。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>上述证据,均经庭审举证、质证,能够相互印证所查明的事实,本院予以确认。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本院认为,被告人任某为逞强耍横、发泄情绪,无事生非,多次在党政机关辱骂国家机关工作人员,随意殴打他人,情节恶劣,其行为已构成寻衅滋事罪。公诉机关指控被告人的犯罪事实清楚,罪名成立,本院予以支持。依据《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十三条</span><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>之规定,判决如下</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人任某犯寻衅滋事罪,判处有期徒刑一年。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(刑期从判决执行之日起计算,判决执行以前先行羁押的,羁押一日折抵刑期一日,即自</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日起至</span><span lang=EN-US>2016</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日止。)</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>如不服本判决,可在接到判决书的第二日起十日内通过本院或者向吕梁市中级人民法院提出上诉。书面上诉的,应提交上诉状正本一份,副本两份。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判长王志立</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判员侯军丽</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人民陪审员张志刚</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>二〇一五年六月二日</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>书记员吴卫东</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-25509812700260256792015-10-07T09:44:00.001-07:002015-10-07T09:44:55.148-07:00环境维权-栾川县人民检察院寻衅滋事罪刑事判决书<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公诉机关栾川县人民检察院。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人魏红权,男,</span><span lang=EN-US>1968</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日出生。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>栾川县人民检察院以栾检刑诉(</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号起诉书指控被告人魏红权犯寻衅滋事罪向本院提起公诉,本院受理后,依法适用普通程序,组成合议庭,公开开庭进行了合并审理,栾川县人民检察院指派检察员倪智华出庭支持公诉,被告人魏红权到庭参加了诉讼。现已审理终结。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公诉机关指控</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>自</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始,被告人魏红权以栾川县金兴公司(原三合金矿)尾矿库影响其居住、出行和生活为由要求金兴公司对其搬迁和赔偿,并开始到各级政府上访。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,经陶湾镇政府、栾川县政府、洛阳市政府调查、复查和复核后,均对魏红权的无理诉求不予支持,并出具信访三级终结意见。该魏接到三级信访终结意见后,仍拒不按照《信访条例》终结信访,而是多次进京上访。在</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>27</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,魏红权先后六次到北京市中南海非法上访,并被北京市公安局西城分局府右街派出所</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次处罚。为此,栾川县公安局于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日先后五次以扰乱单位秩序对魏红权进行行政拘留(每次十日)。但魏红权不思悔改,仍继续非法上访,其行为严重扰乱了社会公共秩序和单位办公秩序,造成极坏的社会影响。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>为支持上述指控的犯罪事实,公诉机关当庭出示被告人魏红权的户籍证明,栾川县陶湾镇人民政府报案材料,魏红权上访材料,栾川县三合金矿安全生产许可证一份,陶湾镇人民政府《关于魏红权信访事项的处理意见》,陶湾镇政府《信访处理意见书》,栾川县政府《信访处理意见书》,洛阳市人民政府信访事项复查复核委员会《信访事项复核决定书》,北京市公安局西城分局府右街派出所工作说明,洛阳市驻京工作信访组证明,中国人民解放军</span><span lang=EN-US>305</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>医院证明书,北京市公安局西城分局《训诫书》,栾川县公安局行政处罚决定书,陶湾镇信访办调处笔录,陶湾镇人民政府</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日提供的情况说明,被告人供述与辩解,证人证言等证据。公诉机关认为被告人魏红权的行为已构成寻衅滋事罪,应依法惩处。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人魏红权辩称</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本人信访是按程序走,没有违反信访程序,也是在无奈的情况下到北京中南海,到那里以后也没有寻衅滋事,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年没有向被告人送达过信访终结意见。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>经审理查明</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>自</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始,被告人魏红权以栾川县金兴公司(原三合金矿)尾矿库影响其居住、出行和生活为由要求金兴公司对其搬迁和赔偿,并开始到各级政府上访。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年经陶湾镇政府、栾川县政府、洛阳市政府调查、复查和复核后,均对魏红权的无理诉求不予支持,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月洛阳市人民政府信访事项复查复核委员会出具信访三级终结意见。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日邢某某、吴某某、李某某在向被告人魏红权宣读并送达三级信访终结决定时,魏红权对该决定书不认可,并拒绝在送达回证上签字。被告人魏红权在</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>27</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,先后六次到北京市中南海非法上访。其中在</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日进京上访过程中,被告人魏红权在北京市中南海西门北侧用菜刀将自己左手小指末节砍伤,进行自残,以图引起国家领导人注意。在</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日进京上访过程中,魏红权于当日晚</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时许,与陶湾镇政府综治办主任李某某及陶湾镇政府计生办主任李某某一同到维稳组李某某的房间内进行协商,在协商过程中,魏红权情绪激动,将房间内窗户打开,企图跳楼,引起楼下很多群众围观,并拨打</span><span lang=EN-US>110</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>报警电话称自己生命受到威胁,造成公共场所秩序被扰乱。在这六次进京上访中,魏红权被北京市公安局西城分局府右街派出所</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次训诫。为此,栾川县公安局于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日先后五次以扰乱单位秩序对魏红权进行行政拘留,每次十日。魏红权的行为严重扰乱了首都北京的社会公共秩序和有关单位办公秩序,造成极坏的社会影响。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>上述事实,有下列经庭审举证、质证的证据证实</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、被告人魏红权户籍证明,证实魏红权出生于</span><span lang=EN-US>1968</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,系完全刑事责任年龄人。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、陶湾镇人民政府报案材料,证实魏红权所反映的问题被洛阳市信访部门三级终结后,以非正常上访相要挟,并进京非访</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、陶湾派出所证明一份,证实魏红权因进京非访,栾川县公安局于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日先后五次以扰乱单位秩序对魏红权进行行政拘留。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、被告人魏红权的供述与辩解,证实先后</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次到北京上访,并于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日进京上访过程中,在北京市中南海西门北侧用菜刀将自己左手小指末节砍伤,因上访共被栾川县公安局行政拘留</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人李某某证言,证明被告人魏红权以三合金矿尾矿库威胁自己住宅及出行为由,多次去工地阻拦施工,公司与他协商多次,因魏红权要求过高,均协商无果。并多次进京上访,于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日上午在中南海附近自残,自己同县政府、镇政府领导将其接回。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人李某某证言,证明魏红权进京上访过六次,自己去接过三次,并给魏红权掏过</span><span lang=EN-US>500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元的事实,在</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日接访过程中,魏红权以跳楼相威胁引起大量群众围观,并证明</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日在自己和吴某某在场情况下,镇政府信访办邢某某向魏红权宣读市政府信访事项复查复核委员会洛政信复(</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>49</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号信访事项复核决定书,魏红权对该决定书不认可,拒绝在送达回证上签字。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人吴某某证言,证明魏红权自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始多次进京上访,自己去接过两次,并给魏红权掏过</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元的事实,并证明</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日在自己和李某某在场情况下,镇政府信访办邢某某向魏红权宣读市政府信访事项复查复核委员会洛政信复(</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>49</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号信访事项复核决定书,魏红权对该决定书不认可,拒绝在送达回证上签字。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人贾某某证言,证明魏红权自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始以三合金矿尾矿库威胁自己住宅为由多次进京上访,自己去接过一次的事实。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人马某某证言,证明魏红权自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始以三合金矿尾矿库威胁自己住宅为由多次进京上访,自己去接过一次,并给魏红权掏过</span><span lang=EN-US>1500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元的事实。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人刘某某证言,证明魏红权自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始以三合金矿尾矿库威胁自己住宅为由多次进京上访,自己去接过一次的事实。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人闫某证言,证明魏红权证明魏红权自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始以三合金矿尾矿库威胁自己住宅为由多次进京上访,自己去接过两次,给其买过一张火车票、掏过</span><span lang=EN-US>300</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元现金的事实。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人李某某证言,证明魏红权自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始多次进京上访,自己去接过一次,在</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日接访过程中,魏红权以跳楼相威胁引起大量群众围观,并证明</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份吴某某、李某某向魏红权宣读市政府信访事项复查复核委员三级终结决定,魏红权对该决定书不认可,拒绝在送达回证上签字。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人邢某某证言,证明魏红权以三合金矿尾矿库威胁自己出行为由,多次上访信访,要求金兴公司在栾川为其购置商品房一套或在陶湾镇买房并为其安排工作,洛阳市人民政府作出三级终结决定后,魏红权又多次赴京非访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、证人郭某证言,证明三合金矿尾矿库工程占用苦桥地组大约三平方地,但自己不清楚是否是魏红权的地。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、魏红权的上访材料,证明魏红权的诉求。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、现场勘验笔录,证明尾矿库至今未投入使用,且尾矿库引洪洞离魏红权家老宅有</span><span lang=EN-US>2000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米左右距离,魏红权老宅早已无人居住,老宅已坍塌,只剩少许半截土墙。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>17</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、三合金矿安全生产许可证副本复印件一份,证明三合金矿当时符合安全生产条件。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、栾川县陶湾镇人民政府出具的关于陶湾镇魏红权信访事项的调查报告,证明魏红权已于</span><span lang=EN-US>1989</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年迁居县城,</span><span lang=EN-US>2001</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年该尾矿库开始使用时,该库上游已无人居住,魏红权反映情况失实。</span><span lang=EN-US>2001</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年该尾矿库建成投入使用至今,始终没有影响到魏红权老宅及出行。对魏红权提出搬迁及赔偿要求不予支持。并向栾川县复查委员会办公室提出申请,请求复查。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>19</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、陶湾镇人民政府对魏红权信访事项处理意见报告,对魏红权要求企业给其无偿购买一套商品房的无理要求不予支持。由三合村委负责在本组安排宅基地一处由其自行建房,或由镇政府帮其在伊和源社区协调</span><span lang=EN-US>120</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平米住房一套。建房或购房资金通过企业补偿资助、搬迁扶贫资金扶持和个人自筹办法解决。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、栾政信查(</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>04</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号信访事项复查意见书,维持陶湾镇人民政府对魏红权信访事项所作的处理意见,对信访人的诉求不予支持。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>21</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、洛政信查(</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>49</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号信访事项复核决定书,维持栾川县人民政府对魏红权信访事项所作的复查意见,对信访人的诉求不予支持。此决定为该信访事项的信访终结意见。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、洛政信查(</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>49</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号关于魏红权信访事项复核决定书的送达回证,证明送达人邢某某、吴某某、李某某,于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,向魏红权送达时,魏红权拒绝签字。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、北京市公安局西城分局府右街派出所的工作说明一份,证明</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>时</span><span lang=EN-US>40</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分许,在中南海大西门北侧便道处发现魏红权左手小拇指受伤,随身携带一把菜刀,菜刀上有血迹,证明魏红权以自残行为进行威胁。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、洛阳市驻京信访工作室证明一份,证明魏红权左手小指末节断裂。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>25</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、中国人民解放军</span><span lang=EN-US>305</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>医院证明书一份,证明魏红权左手小指末节断裂。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、北京市公安局西城分局训诫书,证明魏红权被西城分局府右街派出所训诫。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>27</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、栾川县公安局行政处罚决定书,证明栾川县公安局于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日先后五次以扰乱单位秩序对魏红权进行行政拘留。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、中共陶湾镇信访办调处笔录,证明陶湾镇政府、三合金矿、县领导多次与魏红权进行沟通协商,均调解未果。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本院认为</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人魏红权以栾川县金兴公司尾矿库影响其居住和出行问题没有解决为由,要求各级政府予以解决,并多次到北京重要地区寻衅滋事,严重扰乱了首都北京的公共秩序,其行为已构成寻衅滋事罪。公诉机关指控魏红权犯寻衅滋事罪的罪名及犯罪事实成立,应依法追究被告人魏红权的刑事责任。被告人魏红权辩称自己是按信访程序信访,不构成犯罪的辩护意见与查明的事实不符,本院不予采纳。被告人魏红权因扰乱社会秩序,情节严重,被以犯寻衅滋事罪追究刑事责任,其被行政处罚的拘留时间应折抵刑期。依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百九十三条</span><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>之规定,经审判委员会讨论决定,判决如下</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人魏红权犯寻衅滋事罪,判处有期徒刑三年。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(刑期从判决执行之日起计算,判决执行以前先行羁押的,羁押一日折抵刑期一日,即从二O一四年十月三十一日起至二O一七年九月十一日止。)</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>如不服本判决,可在接到判决书的第二日起十日内通过本院或直接上诉于河南省洛阳市中级人民法院,书面上诉的,应提交上诉状正本一份,副本三份。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判长陶占省</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判员郝斐</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人民陪审员李延武</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>二〇一五年六月五日</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>书记员代银鹏</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-42872604805997644042015-10-07T09:42:00.001-07:002015-10-07T09:42:24.196-07:00环境维权-高某甲寻衅滋事二审刑事裁定书<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原公诉机关河北省承德市鹰手营子矿区人民检察院。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>上诉人(原审被告人)高某甲,出生于河北省承德市鹰手营子矿区,住承德市。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日因涉嫌犯寻衅滋事罪被承德市公安局鹰手营子分局刑事拘留,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日被依法逮捕。现押承德市看守所。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>辩护人何平,北京市安衡律师事务所律师。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>河北省承德市鹰手营子矿区人民法院审理河北省承德市鹰手营子矿区人民检察院指控原审被告人高某甲犯寻衅滋事罪一案,于</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日作出(</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)鹰刑初字第</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号刑事判决。原审被告人高某甲不服,提出上诉。本院依法组成合议庭,决定不开庭审理。经过阅卷,讯问被告人,听取辩护人意见,现已审理终结。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原判决认定,</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,被告人高某甲不满其住房未被划入沉陷区治理补偿范围,与部分汪家庄镇居民多次到北京非正常上访,以此给营子区政府部门施加压力,达到索要非法补偿的目的。后营子区汪家庄镇政府迫于压力,在高某甲等人住房均不在沉陷区治理补偿范围的情况下,答应高某甲提出的要求,并于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日以困难补助的名义付给高某甲等人每人</span><span lang=EN-US>5000.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元人民币,高某甲等人表示不再进京非访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原判决认定上述事实的证据有,</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人耿某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月到</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月间,因高某甲等人要求将他们的住房划入沉陷区治理补偿范围,高某甲等人多次到北京中南海周边非正常上访,给政府部门造成了很大的压力,因为多次形成非正常上访后,区政府会受到省联席办通报或者约谈。在接访的过程中,高某甲提出要镇政府给高某甲等人每人</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元钱,他们就不再上访了。出于维护稳定的目的,也是实在没办法了,便答应了高某甲提出的要求。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,其将高某甲等人叫到其办公室,给高某甲等人每人</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,高某甲等人打了收条,表明以后不再因沉陷区的事情进京非正常上访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人葛某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月末,其给高某甲、何某甲、刘某某做工作,劝他们息诉罢访,高某甲、何某甲提出要求进入沉陷区治理范围,享受沉陷区治理优惠政策,异地搬迁或者给予补偿。其告知她们的房屋不在沉陷区治理范围内,不可能进入沉陷区补偿范围,但考虑她们的实际情况,其可以跟镇领导说说适当给些补偿,她们就同意了,还让其和镇里好好说说多给点。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人何某甲的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,因其住房未被划入沉陷区治理补偿范围,其与高某甲、白某某、刘某某等人多次到北京非正常上访。后其与高某甲、刘某某、白某某四人商量,高某甲说每人得要一、二万元。最后高某甲、白某某与汪家庄镇耿某某谈的,其和刘某某与汪庄矿葛某某谈的,他们答应每人给</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,其与高某甲等人同意了并写了保证书,保证不再进京非正常上访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人白某某的证言证实,其与高某甲等人因沉陷区补偿的事情进京上访过二次,因其与高某甲等人总是上访,后来汪家庄镇耿某某把其与高某甲、何某甲、刘某某四人叫到镇里,在耿某某办公室,其四人每人得</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,并打了收条,此后其与高某甲、何某甲、刘某某四人没有再因沉陷区的事情上访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人赵某甲的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年八、九月份,高某甲到其沸腾锅炉那找人跟高某甲到北京上访。高某甲在沸腾锅炉那片居民区每家都找人了,说那片是危房,应划入沉陷区范围。后其与高某甲、何某甲、白某某、刘某某等人进京非正常上访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人王某甲的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年夏天,高某甲、白某某、何某甲、刘某某多次进京上访找沉陷区的事情,其至少去北京接过高某甲</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)被告人高某甲的供述与辩解证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,因其住房未被划入沉陷区治理补偿范围,其与何某甲、白某某、刘某某四人开始到北京上访,多少次忘记了。后汪家庄镇耿某某找其谈的,劝其息诉罢访,答应给其</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元困难补助,几天后,在耿某某办公室,其与白某某、何某甲、刘某某每人收了</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,都写了息诉罢访保证书,打的困难补助收条,以后其就没有因为沉陷区的事再上访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)收条证实,高某甲、白某某、何某甲、刘某某四人于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,每人收取人民币</span><span lang=EN-US>5000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,并均表示不再找沉陷区问题。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日至</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,被告人高某甲因高血压、心率失常等疾病在承德市第六医院住院治疗,期间用药过敏,后到承德市附属医院复查被查出患有甲亢,高某甲认为患甲亢系用药过敏导致,属医疗事故,遂向承德市第六医院索要赔偿。后经承德市医学会医疗事故技术鉴定认定,高某甲出现甲亢的症状与第六医院的救治无因果关系,不构成医疗事故。高某甲不服,申请重新鉴定,但因高某甲对医方提交的医疗文书部分内容提出质疑,重新鉴定程序被中止。高某甲为了达到索要钱财的目的,多次到鹰手营子矿区信访局、卫生局等部门上访,索赔金额由</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元涨到</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>余万元。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,高某甲分别穿着写有攻击、诽谤承德市第六医院、鹰手营子矿区卫生局的告状牌和白色状衣站在鹰手营子矿区政府、第六医院门口,呼喊"第六医院草菅人命"等话引人围观,扰乱公共秩序。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>为了给当地政府部门施压,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月至</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月间,被告人高某甲累计到北京天安门地区、北京中南海周边、北京外国驻华使馆区非正常上访</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次,其中</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次被北京市公安局扣留、训诫,并送往马家楼接济服务中心,由鹰手营子矿区政府信访等部门接回。后因其上述行为构成扰乱公共场所秩序,承德市公安局鹰手营子分局先后于</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>25</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日对其行政拘留。在接劝返高某甲的过程中,高某甲以不返回和继续上访相要挟,以报销费用的名义向接劝返人员索要现金</span><span lang=EN-US>2480.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。承德市第六医院在多次接劝返高某甲的过程中共计花费</span><span lang=EN-US>23779.78</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原判决认定上述事实的证据有,</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人郑某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,高某甲到第六医院住院治疗,其是高某甲的主治大夫。高某甲主因头晕、心悸,入院后诊断有高血压、心率失常、支气管炎、颈椎病、血脂异常、胆囊炎、咽炎。</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>31</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,其考虑高某甲咽炎、胆囊炎,开了日一次静点克林霉素</span><span lang=EN-US>1.8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>克的药物抗炎治疗,后高某甲出现过敏反应,就停用了。在高某甲住院期间,高某甲反复心悸、出汗、烦躁、易怒,考虑其有甲亢的可能,由于第六医院检查甲亢的项目和治疗药物不完善,建议高某甲到上级医院做检查,后高某甲在上级医院查出患有甲亢。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人张某某、池某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日至</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,高某甲在承德市第六医院住院治疗,在治疗期间高某甲药物过敏,后高某甲被查出患有甲亢。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月到承德市医学会给高某甲做鉴定,鉴定结论是高某甲所患甲亢与在第六医院住院期间的用药和治疗没有任何关系。但高某甲仍然到处上访,要求医院赔偿的数额由</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万涨到</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多万,并以到北京非访、对区政府造成影响来要挟卫生局和医院满足高某甲提出的要求。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,高某甲穿白色告状服和挂告状牌在营子区政府门前和第六医院门前故意闹事。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人李某某、尚某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日早晨,在承德市第六医院门诊楼前,高某甲穿着一身白布大褂,和孝服似的,上面写着"六院医疗事故多,出了问题就是托,专家面前敢瞎说"等内容,还嚷嚷着"第六医院草菅人命",还说"第六医院给她输液输出甲亢来了"。当时在医院门口围了不少人。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人孟某某的证言证实,被告人高某甲自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月以来,共</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次到北京中南海周边、天安门地区、北京驻华使领馆外围非正常上访,其中</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次被北京市公安局扣留、训诫。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人申某某的证言证实,被告人高某甲从</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年春天开始,到北京非正常上访</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>余次,每次接访高某甲时,都不听劝阻,还和接访人员要钱,要求给她报销路费、住宿费、餐费等,否则就不回来。高某甲和第六医院要过一次</span><span lang=EN-US>200</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元、一次</span><span lang=EN-US>500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元、一次</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人王某乙、何某乙的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,其二人到北京接访高某甲,后高某甲向其索要</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元的事实经过。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人赵某乙的证言证实,其一共参与接访高某甲三次,每次高某甲都要求报销费用,第一次给了</span><span lang=EN-US>200</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,第二次给了</span><span lang=EN-US>200</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,第三次给了</span><span lang=EN-US>500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。接访人员都是为了顺利把高某甲接回来,才不得已按照高某甲的要求给报销路费。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)被告人高某甲的供述与辩解证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日至</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,其因高血压、心率失常等疾病在承德市第六医院住院治疗,治疗期间注射克林霉素导致过敏,</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日其到承德市附属医院复查,检查出其患有甲亢,其认为甲亢与药物过敏有关,便向承德市第六医院索赔</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元,后又口头要到</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份,承德市医学会医疗事故技术鉴定作出了鉴定认定,结论是用药过程欠妥,药物过敏是自身问题,甲亢原来就有,不构成医疗事故。其不服,提出去河北省医学会重新鉴定。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,在抽取医学鉴定专家时,因其对第六医院提交的医疗文书内容有异议,河北省医学会中止了重新鉴定程序。其穿着自己制作的状衣和状牌到营子区政府门口两次,到第六医院门口一次,状牌写着"过度治疗危害大,医生行为真可怕"等内容。其跟接劝返人员要过钱,一共要过</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次,一次</span><span lang=EN-US>200</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元、一次</span><span lang=EN-US>500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元、一次</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元,一共</span><span lang=EN-US>1700</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元左右,是路费、住宿费、复印费、饭费等。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)承德市医学会医疗事故技术鉴定书证实,高某甲所患甲亢与高某甲住院期间药物过敏无因果关系,不构成医疗事故。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)河北省医学会医疗事故技术鉴定中止通知书证实,高某甲与承德市第六医院医疗事故争议的再次技术鉴定,因高某甲对医方提交的医疗文书部分内容提出质疑,故抽取专家程序未能如期进行,重新鉴定程序中止。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>11</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)被告人高某甲住院病例证实,高某甲在承德市第六医院住院治疗的过程。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)现场视频截图、照片证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,高某甲在承德市第六医院门口穿状衣,及在营子区政府门前上访时挂的状牌。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)关于汪家庄镇西社区居民高某甲多次进京非正常上访的情况说明证实,高某甲因与承德市第六医院医疗纠纷,高某甲自</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月至</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月到北京天安门地区、中南海周边、外国驻华使馆区非正常上访</span><span lang=EN-US>13</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次,其中</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>次被北京市公安局依法予以训诫。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)承德市公安局鹰手营子分局公安行政处罚决定书证实,因高某甲到北京中南海周边和天安门等地区非正常上访,构成扰乱公共场所秩序,承德市公安局鹰手营子公安分局先后于</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>25</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日对高某甲行政拘留。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)张某某接高某甲北京上访经过证实,高某甲于</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日到北京非访,向其索要</span><span lang=EN-US>130.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日收条证实,高某甲向承德市第六医院报销到石家庄的车费</span><span lang=EN-US>450.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>17</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)承德市第六医院付高某甲费用明细及费用单据证实,承德市第六医院在多次接劝返高某甲的过程中共计花费</span><span lang=EN-US>23779.78</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份,被告人高某甲因其前夫王某丁死亡,向兴隆矿业有限公司(原兴隆矿务局)索要丧葬费、抚恤金、生活费等费用。其多次到兴隆矿业有限公司信访办上访,经信访办工作人员讲明王某丁已于</span><span lang=EN-US>2001</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年被原兴隆矿务局下属的汪庄煤矿除名,不享受其索要的待遇后,高某甲仍频繁、多次上访,并谩骂、撕扯信访办工作人员,强行拿走信访办关于王某丁在汪庄煤矿上班、被除名方面材料拒不归还。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原判决认定上述事实的证据有,</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人倪某某的证言证实,高某甲的前夫王某丁于</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>16</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日在一个石灰厂死亡了。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月至</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份,高某甲就开始到其信访办找王某丁在原兴隆矿务局下属的汪庄煤矿的一些费用和待遇,高某甲提出要求,一是王某丁</span><span lang=EN-US>2001</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年被汪家庄煤矿除名前的生活费,二是被除名时的经济补偿金,三是王某丁死亡后的丧葬费。高某甲与王某丁早于</span><span lang=EN-US>1991</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年就离婚了。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月底上午</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>点左右,高某甲到其办公室,要求看关于王某丁在原汪庄煤矿工作期间及被除名的有关调查材料,其给高某甲看了,她看完后要去复印,其没有同意,高某甲就拿着材料走了,其和谷某某都在场,因为高某甲非常难缠,就没敢和她抢。后来其多次找高某甲要,高某甲都不还。在这事前一个月,高某甲到其单位找王某丁的事情,谷某某就跟其解释,高某甲不爱听就揪住了谷某某上衣领要打谷某某,后来被拉开了。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人谷某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份开始,隔三差五高某甲就到其单位去,开始是找其前夫王某丁死亡后的丧葬费、抚恤金等问题,后来又找王某丁被除名的事。高某甲主要提出要王某丁的丧葬费和抚恤金,但经过调查,王某丁被除名不享受这些待遇。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年春天,高某甲到其单位要看看王某丁的调查材料,其就把材料给高某甲看了,高某甲没怎么看就把材料装包里了,我们要高某甲也不给,拿走后高某甲就没有再还。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份,高某甲到其办公室,因为屋里不太暖和,高某甲要求把小太阳打开,其没同意,高某甲就边骂边抓其衣服要挠其,后被别人拉开。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)证人高某某的证言证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年冬天,其在谷某某办公室,高某甲去了,让谷某某把电暖风打开,谷某某没给开,高某甲说话很不好听,谷某某就和高某甲吵吵起来了,高某甲上前就抓住谷某某上衣去了,二人撕扯在一起,然后被其与倪某某拉开了。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)被告人高某甲的供述与辩解证实,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年腊月,其到兴隆矿业公司找其前夫王某丁被除名的事情,其与王某丁离婚已</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年。在袁某某的办公室,袁某某让其到谷某某办公室看关于王某丁的调查材料,后倪某某将这些材料给其看的,其要复印一份,倪某某不同意,其就将材料装包里了,这个材料一直在其包里放着,有人找其要过,但到现在也没有还回去。关于王某丁的事,其到兴隆矿业公司信访办四、五次,没事其就过去呆着去。还有一天在谷某某办公室,其要求将小太阳插上,谷某某没有同意,其就要自己把小太阳插上,谷某某拥其,其就揪住谷某某上衣胸口,后被人拉开了。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本案尚有如下证据,证人王某丙、胡某某的证言、接劝返经过、出警经过、收条、关于高某甲、何某甲等人案件的情况说明、兴隆矿务局文件、兴隆矿务局汪庄煤矿文件、答复、高某甲上访材料、户籍证明等证据记录在卷佐证,能够认定。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原判决认为,被告人高某甲明知其要求不符合规定,仍采取非法上访、在政府和医院门前公共场所穿着状衣、状牌示威等手段,给政府、承德市第六医院、兴隆矿业有限公司等部门施加压力,强行索要财物,扰乱和破坏了正常的社会秩序,其行为构成寻衅滋事罪。公诉机关指控的罪名成立。被告人高某甲在庭审中提出的辩护意见与本院查明的事实不符,不予采信。据此判决</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>被告人高某甲犯寻衅滋事罪,判处有期徒刑一年六个月。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>高某甲上诉主要提出,其行为不构成寻衅滋事罪,辩护人支持其上诉理由。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>经审理查明,</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(一)、</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,上诉人高某甲因不满其住房未被划入沉陷区治理补偿范围,便与部分居民多次到北京非正常上访。后承德市鹰手营子矿区汪家庄镇政府迫于压力,在高某甲等人住房均不在沉陷区治理补偿范围的情况下,以困难补助的名义付给高某甲等人每人</span><span lang=EN-US>5000.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元人民币,高某甲等人表示不再进京非访。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(二)、</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日至</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,上诉人高某甲因高血压、心率失常等疾病在承德市第六医院住院治疗,期间用药过敏,后到承德市附属医院复查被查出患有甲亢,高某甲认为属医疗事故,遂向承德市第六医院索要赔偿。后经承德市医学会医疗事故技术鉴定认定,高某甲出现甲亢的症状与第六医院的救治无因果关系,不构成医疗事故。高某甲不服,申请重新鉴定,因高某甲对医方提交的医疗文书部分内容提出质疑,重新鉴定程序被中止。高某甲为达到索要钱财的目的,多次到鹰手营子矿区信访局、卫生局等部门上访,索赔金额由</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元涨到</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>余万元。</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>22</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日、</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,高某甲分别穿着写有攻击、诽谤承德市第六医院、鹰手营子矿区卫生局的告状牌和白色状衣站在鹰手营子矿区政府、第六医院门口,呼喊"第六医院草菅人命"等语言引人围观,扰乱公共秩序。</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月至</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月间,高某甲到北京天安门地区、中南海周边、外国驻华使馆区非正常上访</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>余次,多次被北京市公安局扣留、训诫,并送往马家楼接济服务中心,由鹰手营子矿区政府信访等部门接回。因其上述行为构成扰乱公共场所秩序,多次被承德市公安局鹰手营子分局行政拘留。在接劝返高某甲的过程中,高某甲以不返回和继续上访相要挟,以报销费用的名义向接劝返人员索要现金</span><span lang=EN-US>2480.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。承德市第六医院在多次接劝返高某甲的过程中共计花费</span><span lang=EN-US>23779.78</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>(三)、</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份,上诉人高某甲因其前夫王某丁死亡,向兴隆矿业有限公司(原兴隆矿务局)索要丧葬费、抚恤金、生活费等费用。多次到兴隆矿业有限公司信访办上访,经信访办工作人员讲明王某丁已于</span><span lang=EN-US>2001</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年被原兴隆矿务局下属的汪庄煤矿除名,不享受其索要的待遇后,高某甲仍频繁、多次上访,并谩骂、撕扯信访办工作人员,强行拿走信访办关于王某丁在汪庄煤矿上班、被除名方面材料拒不归还。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>原判认定上述全案事实情节正确。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>认定上述事实的前述证据均经原审法院庭审质证,本院审查,证据间能相互印证,予以确认。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本院认为,上诉人高某甲明知其要求不符合规定,仍采取非法上访、在政府和医院门前公共场所穿着状衣、状牌示威等手段,给政府、医院等部门施加压力,强行索要财物,扰乱和破坏了正常的社会秩序的行为,已构成寻衅滋事罪。原判决认定事实和适用法律正确,审判程序合法,量刑适当。高某甲上诉理由及辩护人辩护意见,因无事实依据,本院不予采纳。依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第二百二十五条第一款第(一)项、第二百三十三条之规定,裁定如下</span><span lang=EN-US>:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>驳回上诉,维持原判。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>本裁定为终审裁定。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判长李浩东</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判员王芳</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>审判员李森林</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>二〇一五年六月九日</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>书记员董丽娜</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-62377138549771989632015-10-07T08:28:00.001-07:002015-10-07T08:28:38.634-07:00联署|环保组织呼吁召开浙江武义"垃圾围村"问题听证会<p class="mobile-photo"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfr7tvyTLJQvTUeiowU7GFAItD4GDPxOr_93pF2RQdPnoYzZtlmkGPdCts8TxWueadj6z-Wo1hNhe2jdbCokE41H1HhOo_kZz1HCFnZyw9PsJGVO9cBNqyVhXd_K06Gv2LCYq3JqrsBKmN/s1600/6022FD542C0F469287ED6D70F7D70FF2-718635.png"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfr7tvyTLJQvTUeiowU7GFAItD4GDPxOr_93pF2RQdPnoYzZtlmkGPdCts8TxWueadj6z-Wo1hNhe2jdbCokE41H1HhOo_kZz1HCFnZyw9PsJGVO9cBNqyVhXd_K06Gv2LCYq3JqrsBKmN/s320/6022FD542C0F469287ED6D70F7D70FF2-718635.png" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_6202928001305188354" /></a></p><div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>2015-09-11</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>联署</span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-size:21.0pt;font-family:SimSun'>浙江武义</span></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>垃圾填埋场污染什么?浙江武义填埋场曾有</span><span lang=EN-US>6000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>平方米垃圾露天堆放?</span><span lang=EN-US><br></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>什么?</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前填埋场建设项目未提交报批材料,也无环评批复?</span><span lang=EN-US><br></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>什么?</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年前填埋场设计不达标,污染波及了周边</span><span lang=EN-US>3000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多名无辜村民?</span><span lang=EN-US><br></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>什么?曾被评为长寿村的石井口村,现成了名副其实的</span><span lang=EN-US>"</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>垃圾村</span><span lang=EN-US>"</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>?</span><span lang=EN-US><br></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-family:SimSun'>什么?环保局副局长说:填埋场污染是历史遗留问题不要再去追究?</span></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>什么?</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,当地还要加快启动武义生活垃圾焚烧发电项目??</span><span lang=EN-US><br></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-family:SimSun'>也许您不禁想问,谁会在家堆</span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span lang=EN-US style='font-family:"inherit",serif'>7</span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年垃圾不倒?然而</span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span lang=EN-US style='font-family:"inherit",serif'>——</span></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>填埋场千米之内</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个村庄</span><span lang=EN-US>3000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>村民,他们过了</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年家门口就是垃圾山的生活!</span><span lang=EN-US><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"> <v:stroke joinstyle="miter" /> <v:formulas> <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" /> <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" /> <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" /> <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" /> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" /> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" /> <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" /> <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" /> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" /> <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" /> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" /> <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" /> </v:formulas> <v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" /> <o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" /> </v:shapetype><v:shape id="矩形_x0020_3" o:spid="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="http://mmbiz.qpic.cn/mmbiz/lRibfuZB7QUsgWMgEjPVwdBQrJGTbrWZFkG1FhPiaJdcNP9kDlpSUvnSxPhwE8WC31oQLUoib0fl026ibl1iacPKKUA/640?wx_fmt=jpeg&tp=webp&wxfrom=5&wx_lazy=1" style='width:24pt;height:24pt;visibility:visible;mso-left-percent:-10001;mso-top-percent:-10001;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:char;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:line;mso-left-percent:-10001;mso-top-percent:-10001'> <w:anchorlock/> </v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><img width=32 height=32 src="cid:image001.png@01D10157.E3B111B0" alt="http://mmbiz.qpic.cn/mmbiz/lRibfuZB7QUsgWMgEjPVwdBQrJGTbrWZFkG1FhPiaJdcNP9kDlpSUvnSxPhwE8WC31oQLUoib0fl026ibl1iacPKKUA/640?wx_fmt=jpeg&tp=webp&wxfrom=5&wx_lazy=1" v:shapes="矩形_x0020_3"><![endif]></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>新公参法</span><span lang=EN-US>9.1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>都施行了,还不赶快来先试一试?!《环境保护公众参与办法》已于</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日由环境保护部部务会议通过,现予公布,自</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日起施行。《办法》明确,公民、法人和其他组织发现地方各级人民政府、县级以上环境保护主管部门不依法履行职责的,有权向其上级机关或者监察机关举报。 </span><span lang=EN-US><br></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公众参与办法新鲜出炉,小伙伴快戳【阅读原文】参与联署,维护环境知情权吧!联署拉至文末,点击【阅读原文】,进入表单后即可填写姓名等相关信息!还可以转发朋友圈,找一找有没有认识的朋友也像你一样富有公民参与感哟</span><span lang=EN-US>~</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>浙江省金华市武义生活卫生垃圾填埋场,位于开发区</span><span lang=EN-US>(</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>白洋街道</span><span lang=EN-US>)</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>石井口村附近的官山后垄。作为整个武义县唯一的垃圾场,承载整个武义县城和附近乡镇的垃圾处理任务,但没有任何的环评手续,<span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='color:#F96E57'>违规运行</span></span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span lang=EN-US style='color:#F96E57'>7</span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-family:SimSun;color:#F96E57'>年,对周边人民群众造成了长年累月的健康和精神损害。</span></span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,依照武义县人民政府县长办公会议纪要</span><span lang=EN-US>[2014]2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号文要求,武义县人民政府<span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='color:#F96E57'>拟建武义县生活垃圾焚烧发电项目</span></span>,选址于武义官山后垅生活垃圾填埋场二期预留地块。但是由于垃圾焚烧发电厂建设项目的信息不透明,未做到充分听取公众意见,当地村民与政府的矛盾激化。</span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span lang=EN-US style='color:#F96E57'>2015</span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-family:SimSun;color:#F96E57'>年</span><span lang=EN-US style='color:#F96E57'>8</span></span><span class=tn-powered-by-xiumi><span style='font-family:SimSun;color:#F96E57'>月连续多天百名村民聚集到填埋场拦垃圾车表示抗议,村民也纷纷通过微博、微信平台发表反对呼声。</span></span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>基于垃圾填埋场环境污染现状与公众对焚烧厂选址合理性的疑义,我们希望发起联署,联合你的一份力量,一起去呼吁:</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对未履行环评手续的填埋场建设单位(浙江武义城市发展建设有限公司)、建设审批单位(武义经济开发区管委会)依法给予处分。</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>同时召开环保组织、媒体、村民、专家等多方参与的武义县生活垃圾焚烧发电项目建设听证会。维护环境知情权,我们期待您的参与!</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-82914996072449616802015-10-07T08:27:00.001-07:002015-10-07T08:27:28.190-07:00“中国镉米第一案”败诉,律师:继续打一场“必输”的官司<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>澎湃新闻记者</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>梁月静</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2015-09-12 12:43</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>等待了三个月后,因湖南衡阳市衡东县重金属污染而发起的两起环境诉讼案有了结果。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,集体环境诉讼案"湖南衡阳易</span><span lang=EN-US>XX</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>等</span><span lang=EN-US>53</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人诉衡阳美仑化工环境污染儿童血铅超标案"(下称血铅案)、环境侵权案"汤冬华诉湖南创大钒钨有限公司环境污染责任纠纷案"(下称镉米案)原告同日收到了衡东县人民法院的判决书。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"中国镉米第一案"一审驳回了原告汤冬华的诉讼请求,判决原告败诉;血铅案虽决定被告承担赔偿责任,但仅接受了两位原告的部分诉求,总共赔偿金额不到</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元,"不能称之为胜诉。"两案的原告代理律师胡少波称。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>镉米案原告汤冬华称接下来将继续向衡阳中级人民法院上诉,血铅案原告方也已向律师提出上诉请求。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>判决:"难让人满意"</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>镉米案于</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月由衡东县人民法院受理立案,</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日开庭审理,和</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>12</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日开庭的血铅案一样,两起案件均未当庭宣判。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,湖南省衡东大浦镇,由于土地被污染,大浦镇很多地方都成了荒田。杨一</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>澎湃资料</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>镉米案判决书显示,原告汤冬华诉称种植的稻田距工业园不到</span><span lang=EN-US>2</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公里,</span><span lang=EN-US>2010</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年至</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年种植的水稻由于遭受衡东大埔工业园废水、废气排放影响而绝收,</span><span lang=EN-US>2013-2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年所种植的稻谷经检测镉含量超标,无法上市。除要求被告创大钒钨公司修复污染土地、承担诉讼费用外,还要求被告承担</span><span lang=EN-US>2010</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年到</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年的经济损失</span><span lang=EN-US>92508</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>元。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>法院认为,原告汤冬华提供的证据不能证明自身存在损害结果,也未提供证据证实被告湖南创大钒钨有限公司排放的污染物中涉重金属镉、铅及被告的排污行为与其所称"损害"具有关联性。被告湖南创大钒钨有限公司提交的证据能证实其所产生的工业废物不会因重金属镉、铅对周边环境产生影响,因而驳回原告汤冬华的诉讼请求。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>而在血铅案中,原有的</span><span lang=EN-US>53</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个原告共有</span><span lang=EN-US>51</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个血铅超标儿童,另两个是镉超标的成年人。根据体内血铅含量高低,原告方曾制定了</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万、</span><span lang=EN-US>37</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万两个赔偿标准,合计超过</span><span lang=EN-US>800</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万。但随着撤诉人数不断增多,诉讼代表人张强(化名)介绍,最终出庭的十余名原告的索赔金额已降至百万元左右。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>即便如此,案件的判决依然难让原告方满意,血铅案判决书显示,被告衡阳美仑化工有限公司被判赔偿两名原告共两万六千余元,驳回了其余原告的所有请求,张强称,这远远不能弥补他们遭受到的人身、财产、精神损失。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>污染:始于以化工为主的工业园</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>美仑化工公司和创大钒钨公司均位于大浦镇的衡东大浦工业园内,这个省级工业园自</span><span lang=EN-US>2003</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年成立后,先后引进中南、大化、美仑、广盛制药、创大、金镝、金宇、顶欣、合林等以化工、冶炼为主导的多家重金属企业。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>24</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,衡东县大浦镇的重金属污染情况曝光。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据澎湃新闻</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>26</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日报道,衡东县大浦镇至少有</span><span lang=EN-US>300</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>儿童血铅超标,消息一出引发舆论关注,</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>14</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,央视新闻频道《新闻直播间》用时近</span><span lang=EN-US>25</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>分钟,对衡东县的血铅超标儿童进行了报道,报道称,仅大浦镇就有超过</span><span lang=EN-US>300</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>名儿童血铅超标,大浦镇炉铺村稻田中镉含量则为</span><span lang=EN-US>16.7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>毫克</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>千克,超标</span><span lang=EN-US>16.7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>倍。正因为此,这些耕地近年来水稻产量严重下降,不及正常年产量的三分之一,并且还有多数耕地抛荒。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>高毒害、难排出……一篇篇报道让居民们坐不住了。在环保组织和环境诉讼律师的帮助下,</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年下半年起,血铅超标家庭和受到镉米影响的汤冬华开始着手上诉。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>上诉:打一场"必输"的官司</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>判决书显示,由于被告提交的证据能证实其排放的工业废物不涉镉、铅或低于检测值下限,不会因镉、铅对周边环境产生影响,可以认定被告不存在排放含重金属镉、铅污染物的行为。胡少波认为,法院没有按照司法解释中的"无过错"原则判决,"这绝对是站不住脚的"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,《最高人民法院关于审理环境侵权责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《解释》)发布,《解释》坚持了"无过错原则",第一条即明确,因污染环境造成损害,不论污染者有无过错,污染者应当承担侵权责任。污染者以排污符合国家或者地方污染物排放标准为由主张不承担责任的,人民法院不予支持。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>判决书显示,由于原告提交的三份稻谷及农田壤重金属超标检验报告"委托程序及取样过程均存在明显瑕疵",因此均"不能作为本案定案的依据"。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>胡少波坦言,败诉其实算是意料之中。他分析称,由于案件性质,基层法院或许也有种种压力,希望交由更高一级的法院裁决,"中院如果能改判就改判,如果不能,还可以发回重审,到时候改判的可能性会更大。"</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"谁都希望胜诉,但环境侵权的案子比一般的侵权案都要难,现在新环保法出台,各项司法解释更加完善,这样的案件已经得到国家和司法系统的重视,当初立案已经是意外了,只要你去做,去上诉,它的意义就要比你什么都不做要强一百倍。"胡少波称,即便对结果不乐观,也必须要打:"让外界知道,有这么一群人在维权,在推动这些事情,从这个角度来看,官司败了也是胜。"</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>作为血铅案和镉米案代理律师,胡少波这一年来得出一个感受,只要双方亦步亦趋按照法律程序走,不管最后胜诉败诉,风险会比臆想中的小,不用过于担心"秋后算账"。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>有了一审的经验,在接下来的上诉中,原告方会加强取证规范性方面的工作。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>判决结果出来前,汤冬华和朋友打了个赌,他押输,朋友说赢,结果如他所料,汤冬华赢得"赌局"。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"我老婆都不觉得我会赢",汤冬华告诉澎湃新闻,其实在决定起诉之初,自己已认定了今天这个结果,接下来的上诉,在亲友看来又是在筹划一场必输的赌局。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>环境:"保护农户切身利益"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,衡东县召开</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年重金属污染耕地应急性修复的扩面试点项目工作会议,衡东县的项目是湖南首批重金属污染耕地扩面修复项目之一。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据湖南农业网消息,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,衡东县拟在</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个乡镇的</span><span lang=EN-US>134840</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亩稻田开展重金属污染耕地应急性修复试点,项目资金</span><span lang=EN-US>3268</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元,修复面积与修复资金居全省第一位。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>扩面试点区主要采用种植低镉品种、施用生石灰、优化水分管理、增施有机肥、喷施叶面阻控剂等</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>项技术措施。衡阳市农业委成立了污染修复工作领导小组和技术指导组制定实施方案,确定了到村、到组、到户的修复面积。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>而根据湖南农业信息网一篇名为《衡东县农业局采取有力措施积极应对稻米重金属镉污染》的文章报道,早在</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年,大浦镇新民村和堰城村已有</span><span lang=EN-US>1000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亩耕地示范和推广了重金属污染耕地修复治理</span><span lang=EN-US>VIP</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>技术。</span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>报道在"依法妥善处理农业污染案件,保护农户切身利益"部分中称,衡东县重点调查、鉴定、协调处理了大浦镇四个村受大浦工业园"三废"污染案件影响的油菜、早中晚稻田</span><span lang=EN-US>500</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多亩,赔偿农民经济损失</span><span lang=EN-US>70</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>多万元。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-83616589294819491852015-10-07T08:25:00.001-07:002015-10-07T08:25:40.946-07:00环保组织诉企业污染接连被地方拒立案,谁在阻拦环境公益诉讼<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>来源:澎湃新闻</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>时间:</span><span lang=EN-US>2015-09-25 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者:周辰</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>实习生</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>庄雅瑜</span><span lang=EN-US> </span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><a href="http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1378897">http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1378897</a></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>新环保法实施至今,曾被寄予厚望的环境公益诉讼仍徘徊在门槛。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日前,宁夏回族自治区中卫市中级人民法院(下称中卫市中级法院)以"主体不适格"为由,驳回了中国生物多样性保护与绿色发展基金会(下称绿发会)起诉当地</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>家企业涉嫌污染腾格里沙漠的案件。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日施行的新环保法对环境公益诉讼作出规定,对污染环境、破坏生态,损害社会公共利益的行为,符合条件的社会组织可向法院提起诉讼。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>但新环保法实施近</span><span lang=EN-US>300</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>天,环境公益诉讼并没有出现当初专家们预言的"井喷"现象,相反,却出现遇冷局面。多位接受澎湃新闻(</span><span lang=EN-US>www.thepaper.cn</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)采访的环保组织负责人表示,环境公益诉讼面临来自企业、法院和地方政府等多方阻力。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,山东省环保厅一位官员向澎湃新闻表示,他认为环保组织在进行公益诉讼过程中受到企业威胁和地方保护障碍的情况是客观存在的,"在中国目前的国情下,有些企业还存在各方面裙带关系,另外这些企业贡献了不少</span><span lang=EN-US>GDP</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,还解决了大量就业,当地政府也不一定能配合起诉这些企业。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>最高人民法院环境资源司法理论研究基地研究员马勇告诉澎湃新闻,地方政府和法院不啃"硬骨头"、爱捏"软柿子",正是目前环境公益诉讼面临的常态,对一些难度低又可以作为政绩的案件,地方政府"喜闻乐见",对一些敏感的"大案要案",地方政府和法院则"敬而远之"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中国政法大学环境资源法教授王灿发接受澎湃新闻采访时认为,造成环保组织进行公益诉讼困难重重的原因,主要是国家的环境公益诉讼机制还没有完全建立,"包括有关的立法、与支持公益诉讼的机构、资金、政策都还不到位。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"收到公益诉讼案件需马上向高院汇报"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月,腾格里沙漠污染事件经媒体曝光后,引起全社会的广泛关注。一些企业将生产废水向沙漠直排,造成严重环境污染。随后,中共中央总书记习近平等中央领导作出重要批示。国务院专门成立督察组,敦促腾格里工业园区进行大规模整改。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据绿发会的起诉状,此次公益诉讼的目的,是希望肇事企业能承担相应民事责任,停止污染环境并修复被污染的生态。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>但是,此前已多次提起环境公益诉讼,并获得立案的绿发会,此次却被中卫市中级法院判定为"主体不适格",不予立案。法院的民事裁定书称,绿发会从事的生物多样性保护与环境保护无关,其业务范围也未写明包括环境公益诉讼,因此不符合原告资格。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"法院的理由按常识判断便很不合理,因为绿发会多年来一直从事的生物多样性保护正是环境保护的一部分。"马勇说。就主体资格问题,绿发会已于</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>27</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日向宁夏高院提起上诉。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"如果被告企业正常应诉并不丢人,反而能体现企业愿意承担社会责任的态度。结果法院将这个诉讼挡在门外,这完全是不应该的,也是没必要的。"马勇认为,是腾格里沙漠污染案本身的敏感性令中卫市中级法院"望而生畏"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中卫市中级法院此案负责人曾对《新京报》记者表示,腾格里沙漠污染案属于重大案件,不予立案的决定是向上级汇报请示后做出的。对此,马勇分析说,法院请示上级领导的举动更体现出其保守和害怕负责任的态度。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>北京林业大学生态法研究中心副主任杨朝霞告诉澎湃新闻,根据宪法规定,法院应独立行使审判权,包括不受上级法院干预,也不需请示上级法院。在实际操作中遇到请示上级的情况,原因一般有两个:一是担心自己水平不够把握不准,二是担心与上级观点不一致,害怕事后担责。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,中卫市中级法院此案相关负责人向澎湃新闻解释称,所谓的"向上级请示"是媒体的误解,实际上他们只是按规定向上级汇报。"该案属于新型案件、敏感案件,因为我们之前从未受理过这种案件,而且公益诉讼也是民事诉讼新颁布的制度。我们宁夏高院有规定,收到公益诉讼案件需要马上向高院汇报,但是具体工作还是由中院本身依法裁定。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>有官方背景和无官方背景的环保组织"同案不同命"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>与绿发会类似,另一热心环境公益诉讼的公益组织自然之友,也曾遭遇"主体不适格"尴尬。该组织曾希望赶在江苏泰州</span><span lang=EN-US>1.6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亿元天价赔偿案</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年底宣判前,对该案遗漏的</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>家企业另行提起公益诉讼,结果被泰州市中级人民法院裁定"不予立案"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《中国环境报》曾报道,打赢</span><span lang=EN-US>1.6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亿元天价赔偿环境公益诉讼案的泰州市环保联合会,在提起诉讼时得到了政府和环保部门的大力支持,与其明显的官方背景不无关系。《南方周末》报道称,泰州市环保联合会由泰州市环保局成立,工作人员由市环保局兼任,秘书长童宁则是泰州市环保局副局长。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"我们也是想看看,同一案件,所有的变量都一样,当地的环保联合会可以提起诉讼,我们作为没有官方背景的民间组织能否提起诉讼?"自然之友总干事张伯驹就此事接受《新京报》采访时表示,"现在看,并不是一帆风顺。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>法院的民事裁定书表示,起诉人并非专门从事环保公益活动的社会组织,而是从事环境研究的研究机构,无法成为公益诉讼原告。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>于是,自然之友选择向江苏省高院提起上诉。诉状称,自然之友作为在北京市朝阳区民政局注册的民办非企业单位,是符合法律规定的"社会组织",按照环保法,具备进行公益诉讼的资格。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>最终,江苏省高院撤销了泰州中院的裁定,该案得以立案。</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,澎湃新闻致电江苏省高院环资庭庭长就此事进行采访,被其婉拒。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>其实,自然之友在公益诉讼方面的表现并非一直"灰头土脸",由该组织作为原告的"福建南平生态破坏案",正是</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日新环保法生效后的环境公益诉讼"第一案"。"</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日是元旦法定节假日,但是法院还是选择在这一天进行立案,对这一案件的重视可见一斑。"马勇说。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对此,福建省南平市中级人民法院生态资源审判庭某不愿意透露姓名的庭长向澎湃新闻介绍说,该案的确得到了当地政府和检察院的大力支持,进展也十分顺利,但他也强调法院之所以会选择于</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日立案是出于"法律规定的立案流程和时限的考虑"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"泰州的案子前后共经历了</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个月才得以立案,但是南坪的案子仅</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个月就立案了,从时间上对比很强烈。"自然之友环保法律项目负责人葛枫告诉澎湃新闻。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"环保组织得到的帮助越来越小,污染企业越来越嚣张"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"(环境)公益诉讼可能给一个地方的经济发展造成很大的障碍。"王灿发向澎湃新闻表示,有了环境公益诉讼,某些对地方经济发展很重要、同时对地方环境影响较大的项目便无法蒙混过关,"这种情况下,地方上也会明着或者暗地里来抵制公益诉讼。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>环保组织自然大学的志愿者徐勇向澎湃新闻表示,他和他的同伴们在进行公益诉讼时,经常收到来自被告企业和当地政府的"劝说","时不时还会登门拜访,跟我们聊上好几个小时,让我们停止诉讼。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>大连市环保志愿者协会副会长唐在林则向澎湃新闻透露,他在收集公益诉讼证据时还曾多次被专业检测机构拒绝,"原因就是听说我们做检测是为了给公益诉讼提供证据,他们一听就不想掺和,认为这是跟政府唱反调,怕有麻烦。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"虽然我们组织自己也有检测设备,但无法直接用作证据,只能作为参考。"徐勇也遭遇过被检测机构拒绝的经历。他介绍说,如果有专门检测机构的正式检测报告,可以直接用作法律证据,这对面临取证困难的公益诉讼来说是非常珍贵的。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"有些专业机构拒绝提供鉴定,有时候是怕惹麻烦,但有时候是出于政治上的担心,对公益组织不信任,会怀疑这个组织的性质和背景,尤其是当该组织的资金支持来源于国外。"王灿发分析。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"一方面我们得到的帮助越来越少,另一方面污染企业会愈发嚣张。"唐在林说,他们尤其对私营企业的公益诉讼格外小心,"影响了他们的利益,他们必然会生气,之前我们就有志愿者半夜在路上被瓶子砖头袭击。"</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>有受访的公益组织负责人表示,他们机构会为参与公益诉讼的每个志愿者和律师购买人身伤害意外险。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>环保公益诉讼预期的"井喷"没有出现</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年初新环保法实施后,民政部民间组织管理局曾统计,根据新环保法和最高法司法解释,截至</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年第三季末,全国共有</span><span lang=EN-US>700</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>余家社会组织符合提起环境民事公益诉讼的条件。当时,不少专家曾认为,诉讼权放开后,环保组织的公益诉讼定会出现一个"井喷期"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>但现实却大相径庭。自然之友对</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日至</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月底依据新环保法提起的环境民事公益诉讼个案进行了梳理,结果显示,全国依据新环保法提起的,进入司法程序的环境民事公益诉讼个案仅有</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>起,其中一起已经调解结案,一起一审开庭审理结束,一起裁定不予受理,其他</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>起案子均正在审理。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在环境民事公益诉讼寥寥无几的现状下,环资庭也面临对环境类案件"无案可审"的局面。在最高人民法院的指示下,至</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年末,共有</span><span lang=EN-US>20</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个省(市、自治区)人民法院设立了</span><span lang=EN-US>371</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>个环境资源审判庭、合议庭、巡回法庭。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"现状就是目前很多环资庭都没有什么环境案件可以审,都是审理别的案子,像离婚案、交通肇事案。"前述南平市中级人民法院生态资源审判庭庭长告诉澎湃新闻。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-53733856530892123302015-10-07T08:24:00.001-07:002015-10-07T08:24:08.876-07:00自然之友诉北京市昌平区都市芳园小区湖泊非法施工<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>发布者:自然之友</span><span lang=EN-US> | </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日期:</span><span lang=EN-US>2015-07-24</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>由自然之友就北京市昌平区都市芳园小区湖泊非法施工事件发起的公益诉讼案今天(</span><span lang=EN-US>23</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日)立案。该案由北京市第四中级人民法院受理,是北京第一例环境民事公益诉讼案件。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据了解,位于北京市昌平区东小口镇的都市芳园小区,有一个总面积约</span><span lang=EN-US>200 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>亩的湖泊湿地。自</span><span lang=EN-US>2014 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月起,被告北京都市芳园房地产开发有限公司、北京九欣物业管理有限公司,不顾居民群众的反对,在没有办理许可手续的情况下,非法组织施工作业,将建筑垃圾和建筑开槽土等倾倒入湖,填埋湖泊区域,严重破坏了植被、湿地等生态系统。至今,倾倒建筑垃圾等填湖行为仍在进行,原有湖泊区域四分之三以上被渣土填满,连接社区东西两岸的桥梁随之拆除,正常生长的植物群落遭到毁坏,原来的良好生态环境消失殆尽。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>经小区业主多次向政府反映、举报,北京市昌平区城市管理综合行政执法监察局经过调查,于</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>10</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>25</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日就北京都市芳园房地产开发有限公司在小区湖泊填埋工地渣土的行为下达《责令改正通知书》。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>自然之友表示,二被告未经办理任何手续,在都市芳园小区湖泊区域内通过填埋湖泊、毁坏天然植被的方式消纳建筑垃圾,这一行为违反了《环境保护法》、《土地管理法》、《侵权责任法》、《北京市生活垃圾管理条例》、《北京市湿地保护条例》以及《湿地保护管理规定》,严重破坏相关生态系统的完整性、稳定性,严重妨碍生态服务功能的发挥,已经损害了社会公共利益。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>为保护都市芳园小区原有湖泊湿地,制止违法处置建筑垃圾的行为,维护环境公共利益,依照《环境保护法》第五十八条和相关法律、司法解释的规定,自然之友要求二被告立即停止在北京市昌平区都市芳园小区湖泊的施工作业,不得继续破坏原有生态,并且承担生态环境修复费用共</span><span lang=EN-US>950</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元。同时,被告需赔偿期间损失,用于昌平区湿地保护等公益事业。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>北京市第四中级人民法院表示,此案为北京地区第一例环境民事公益诉讼案件,同时也是适用新修订的《中华人民共和国环境保护法》、《最高人民法院关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释》受理的第一例环境民事公益诉讼案件。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>目前,此案已经进入司法程序。自然之友将进一步搜集案件有关证据,包括寻求相关领域生态专家的协助,对该区域的生态服务功能进行评估。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>自</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日新《环保法》实施以来,自然之友提起并获得立案的环境公益诉讼案共</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>起,包括福建南平开矿毁林公益诉讼案、江苏泰州废酸倾倒案、贵州清镇铝铁矿山大气污染案以及北京都市芳园环境公益诉讼案。此外,自然之友公益基金会发起的环境公益诉讼支持基金目前已支持了</span><span lang=EN-US>8</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>起环境公益诉讼案例,涵盖水污染、大气污染、生态破坏、土壤污染等领域。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-15052329405378698112015-10-07T08:22:00.001-07:002015-10-07T08:22:34.735-07:00怒江大峡谷化工项目未批先建 叫停4天后通过环评<div class=WordSection1><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>来源:《财经》杂志</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>时间:</span><span lang=EN-US>2015-06-16 </span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>记者:高胜科</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>在峭壁林立的怒江大峡谷之间,一个化工项目悄然落地。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"项目主体工程已完成,现场有工人作业,厂区内还可以听到机器开足马力的轰鸣声音,工人说正在调试设备。"</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,一名刚从现场调研回来的自然之友志愿者告诉《财经》记者。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>这是一个年产</span><span lang=EN-US>1.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨高氯酸钾的化工项目,是云南省怒江州州政府"产业建设年"三年行动计划中的新建项目。据该项目环评公示,项目总投资</span><span lang=EN-US>4937</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元,计划于</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月投入运行。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,环保组织自然之友向怒江州环保局提交了一份举报意见函,认为项目存在重大环境风险,不宜仓促通过环评审批,应严格按法律规定暂缓项目环评审批,并就此召开听证会。该函同时抄送国家环保部西南督查中心、云南省环保厅,截至记者发稿均未获正式回应。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>"我们已将这份意见函转给了具体业务科室部门,具体情况还不了解。"</span><span lang=EN-US>6</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,一位怒江州环保局办公室人士对《财经》记者说。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据了解,该项目选址于云南省怒江州福贡县上帕镇古泉村附近,与周边村庄的饮用水源地、怒江支流</span><span lang=EN-US>--</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>古泉河仅几米之隔。在反对者看来,该化工项目的落建将给当地生态带来极高风险。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>经怒江州环保局调查,该项目于</span><span lang=EN-US>2014</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>7</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月开始建设,调查期间已完成了主厂房和储罐等关键设备建设,一期生产线已安装完毕,并在今年</span><span lang=EN-US>3</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月开机调试,二期生产线正在安装中。未取得环保审批手续,就开工建设,已是违规,因而,今年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日,怒江州环保局对该项目实施行政处罚,立即停止一切建设活动,并缴纳</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元的罚款,并限时完成环评审批手续。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>戏剧变化在四天之后,怒江州环保局对该项目的环评批复文件中称,项目所在区域环境较为敏感,且处于《云南省主体功能区规划》中的限制发展区。然而,该局却批复了该环评报告。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>自然之友在举报意见函中称,环保部门的行政处罚不当,责令限期补办环评手续已违反新《环保法》规定。依据《环保法》,建设单位未依法提交建设项目环评文件,或环评文件未经批准,擅自开工建设的,由环保部门责令停止建设,处以罚款,并可以责令恢复原状。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>另外,该项目有违于规划环评。国家环保部</span><span lang=EN-US>2012</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年发布《关于进一步加强环境影响评价管理防范环境风险的通知》称,石化化工建设项目原则上应进入依法合规设立、环保设施齐全的产业园区,并符合园区发展规划及规划环评要求。而依据相关法律法规开展的福贡县产业园区规划环评,已明确提出"取消福贡县工业园区的化工辐射区"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>据此,年产</span><span lang=EN-US>1.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨高氯酸钾项目属化工项目,"既不符合该园区及当地的发展规划,也不宜纳入福贡县工业园区,还违反了环保部文件规定的要求。"自然之友法律与政策倡导总监葛枫说。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>怒江州环保局则在批复环评文件中解释称,鉴于福贡县的环境承载能力,该项目不宜做大做强,不宜扩大规模,最终控制规模为</span><span lang=EN-US>1.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨,不得扩大规模和产能。不过,建设单位、福贡县群晟电盐科技有限公司法人代表苏良作告诉《财经》记者,该项目原计划就是</span><span lang=EN-US>1.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨</span><span lang=EN-US>/</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年产的规模,并称"目前没有关注到有环保组织反对的消息,这个项目的审批手续都是完整的,环境风险也都是可控的"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该项目由福贡县引进湖南省资兴市隆盛化工厂投资建设,后者新注册成立了福贡县群晟电盐科技有限公司,作为建设单位。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该项目紧邻村庄,距最近的日王念村仅有</span><span lang=EN-US>115</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米。根据该项目环评报告,高氯酸钾发生爆炸的死亡半径为</span><span lang=EN-US>98.9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米,重伤半径</span><span lang=EN-US>229.1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>米。葛枫据此表示,环保审查部门一定要以对周边群众负责的角度,对此项目严格审查。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>高氯酸钾是一种危险化学品,主要用于炸药、焰火及火柴的生产,按《危险化学品安全管理条例》规定应受公安部门严格管制。生产过程中,有六价铬、氢气、氯气、氯化氢等危险、有毒物质产生。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>项目环评报告显示,福贡县该项目每年将产生</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨的含铬废渣,铬渣属于危险废物,收集后要交由昆明市危险废物处置中心处置。"福贡县距昆明</span><span lang=EN-US>680</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>公里,长距离的铬渣转移,成本昂贵,中间一旦发生非法倾倒事件,很可能导致</span><span lang=EN-US>2011</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年曲靖铬渣案重演。"葛枫担心,如果转移过程中发生意外,一旦致危险废物翻入怒江,其环境影响将难以估量。</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3570508117158086531.post-65570613388231017692015-10-07T08:21:00.001-07:002015-10-07T08:21:39.609-07:00关于福贡县群晟电盐科技有限公司15000吨高氯酸钾建设项目环评审批的意见函<div class=WordSection1><p><span lang=EN-US>2015-06-16</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>尊敬的怒江州环保局:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>近日我们从贵局网站查阅到福贡县群晟电盐科技有限公司</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目正在环评审批前公示,经仔细查阅该项目的环评报告,并对照我国的新《环境保护法》、《环境影响评价法》以及相关的政策规章,我们认为该项目存在重大环境风险,不宜仓促通过环评审批,应当严格按照法律规定和国家的产业政策,暂缓项目环评审批,召开听证会,审慎审查该项目。具体理由如下:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>一</span><span lang=EN-US>.</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该项目未批先建,严重违反环保法和环评法相关规定,不应责令限期补办环评手续</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据怒江州环境保护局网上公示,</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日以怒环罚(</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号文公布了</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《怒江州环境保护局对福贡县群晟电盐科技有限公司</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸家建设项目"未批先建"环境违法行为的行政处罚决定》</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,决定要求:福贡县群晟电盐科技有限公司立即停止</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾项目一切建设活动;罚款人民币</span><span lang=EN-US>5.00</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万元整,要求于</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>30</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日前完成环评审批手续。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>链接:</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>http://xxgk.yn.gov.cn/Z_M_004/Info_Detail.aspx?DocumentKeyID=C23C292A46BF4928A2AFA7D6B53EB13E</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>贵局做出的责令限期补办环评的决定违反新《环保法》规定。依据新《环境保护法》"第六十一条,建设单位未依法提交建设项目环境影响评价文件或者环境影响评价文件未经批准,擅自开工建设的,由负有环境保护监督管理职责的部门责令停止建设,处以罚款,并可以责令恢复原状"。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>根据新《环境保护法》的规定,对于未批先建的违法项目只能停止建设,并可以责令恢复原状,不允许补办环评。一直以来《环境影响评价法》第三十一条允许未批先建项目限期补办环评手续的规定饱受诟病,因此新《环境保护法》的规定代表我国对于未批先建违法项目的"零容忍"态度。贵局做出的限期补办环评手续的处罚决定违反了新《环境保护法》规定。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>二</span><span lang=EN-US>.</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该项目不符合《关于进一步加强环境影响评价管理防范环境风险的通知》(环发</span><span lang=EN-US>[2012]77</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号)要求</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>依据环境保护部文件环发</span><span lang=EN-US>[2012]77</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号《关于进一步加强环境影响评价管理防范环境风险的通知》,石化化工建设项目原则上应进入依法合规设立、环保设施齐全的产业园区,并符合园区发展规划及规划环境影响评价要求。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中第七章"环境规划符合性"一节指出:《怒江州环境保护局关于福贡县产业园区总体规划环境影响报告书》的审查意见中取消福贡县产业园区化工辐射区,但目前福贡县委、政府强力推进并已经发改、工信等部门批准在建的</span><span lang=EN-US>1.5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>万吨高氯酸钾项目,已形成事实。综合专家意见,鉴于福贡县的环境承载能力,不宜做大做强,不宜扩大规模,不宜形成片区,建议作为单个项目纳入园区管理,县级人民政府作为区域环境监管责任主体。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>按相关法律法规开展的福贡县工业园区规划环评明确提出"取消福贡县工业园区的化工辐射区",</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾项目属于化工项目,不符合该园区的发展规划,不宜纳入福贡县工业园区。因此我们认为,</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目不符合《关于进一步加强环境影响评价管理防范环境风险的通知》(环发</span><span lang=EN-US>[2012]77</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>号)要求,项目亦不符合当地的工业发展规划。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>三</span><span lang=EN-US>.</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该项目产生的副产品氯酸钠,属于现行产业政策限制类</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》</span><span lang=EN-US>1</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>中第七章"产业政策"一节指出:项目中间产物氯酸钠属于限制类,但其仅作为副产品外售,项目为高氯酸钾生产项目,不在鼓励类、限制类和淘汰类目录中,属于允许类项目,本项目建设符合国家产业政策。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>对照《产业结构调整指导目录》(</span><span lang=EN-US>2013</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年修正),"第二类</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>限制类</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>四、石化化工</span><span lang=EN-US> 5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、新建三聚磷酸钠、六偏磷酸钠、三氯化磷、五硫化二磷、饲料磷酸氢钙、氯酸钠、少钙焙烧工艺重铬酸钠、电解二氧化锰、普通级碳酸钙、无水硫酸钠(盐业联产及副产除外)、碳酸钡、硫酸钡、氢氧化钡、氯化钡、硝酸钡、碳酸锶、白炭黑(气相法除外)、氯化胆碱生产装置</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>",明确规定新建氯酸钠生产线属于限制类,尽管在本项目中氯酸钠是工艺中间产物,但其直接产生后同样会对环境造成影响,应当认为项目产品包括氯酸钠,并纳入国家限制类产业进行规范。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>因此我们认为:《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》做出"项目不在鼓励类、限制类和淘汰类目录中,属于允许类项目"的结论不科学。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>四</span><span lang=EN-US>.</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>环评提出的危险废物处置措施可行性不足</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》指出:年产生</span><span lang=EN-US>15</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨的含铬废渣,其属于危险废物,收集后交由昆明市危险废物处置中心处置。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>福贡县距离昆明</span><span lang=EN-US>680km</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,如此长距离的铬渣危险废物转移,路途遥远成本昂贵,中间一旦发生非法倾倒事件,有可能导致</span><span lang=EN-US>2011</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年曲靖陆良铬渣案件重演。同时,危险废物转移线路可能沿怒江行进,如转移人员驾驶不当或者其他因素,导致危险废物翻入怒江中,其引起的环境影响是难以估量的。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>五、大气环境影响评价按三级评价不符合技术导则要求</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>高氯酸钾生产属于高耗能行业,项目选址在福贡县正是看重怒江流域各级水电站可以供给便宜的电力资源。《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》中大气环境影响评级等级为三级,而《环境影响评价技术导则</span> <span style='font-family:SimSun'>大气环境》(</span><span lang=EN-US>HJ2.2-2008</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)中明确要求"对于高耗能行业的多源(两个以上,含两个)项目,评价等级应不低于二级"。因此我们认为:大气评价等级设置不符合技术导则要求,评价结论不可信。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>六</span><span lang=EN-US>.</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>该项目存在高环境风险,应当进行严格审查</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》指出:高氯酸钾发生爆炸的死亡半径为</span><span lang=EN-US>98.8m</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>、重伤半径</span><span lang=EN-US>229.1m</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>,一旦发生爆炸,紧邻的古泉河水体势必受到污染,距离最近的日王念村(约</span><span lang=EN-US>115m</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>)将受到重伤伤害。想一想</span><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>4</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月份刚刚发生的福建古雷</span><span lang=EN-US>px</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>爆炸事故所造成的严重后果,审查部门一定要本着为周边群众负责的态度,对此类项目进行严格审查。另外,建设单位未办理任何环保手续,就开始违法建设,视环保法和环评法如儿戏,建设和生产过程中的环境管理和环境风险防范能力、环境守法意识均让公众质疑,是否可以真正做到达标排放和不改变区域的环境功能?</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>七、公众参与调查群体不合理</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>《福贡县</span><span lang=EN-US>15000</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>吨高氯酸钾建设项目环境影响报告书(报批稿)》指出:个人调查部分共发放调查表</span><span lang=EN-US>55</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>份,包括项目所在地涉及的日王念村(</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人)、古泉村(</span><span lang=EN-US>28</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人)、木古甲村(</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人)等关心点目标居民及群众。回收调查表</span><span lang=EN-US>55</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>份,占发放调查表总数的</span><span lang=EN-US>100%</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>距离项目最近的日王念村是受到噪声影响、废气影响、环境风险潜在危害最大的村庄,相反发放问卷仅</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>份,而环评报告中亦未给出各环境保护目标的人口分布情况,对于日王念村的居住人口不会仅有</span><span lang=EN-US>9</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>人,这样做出的调查问卷不仅不合理,而且非常不负责任。该项目属于高耗能高风险行业,环境风险影响人群为</span><span lang=EN-US>3km</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>范围内,作为公众参与应调查潜在受影响人群,公众参与调查问卷应不低于</span><span lang=EN-US>100</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>份,按照科学统计的方法发放。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>综上,我们认为这样一个违法建设在先,且存在高风险高污染的项目,作为我们的环境监管部门一定要认真听取周边群众和专家的意见,不能为了一点经济利益牺牲几代人的健康幸福和美丽家园。我们郑重建议,贵局在做出环评审批之前召开听证会,征求公众与专家意见,履行环评审批的合法程序。</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>望贵局对我们提出的上述请求予以调查落实、并给予详细的回复!</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>此致</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>为盼!</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>北京市朝阳区自然之友环境研究所</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>云南省大众流域管理研究及推广中心</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>2015</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>年</span><span lang=EN-US>5</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>月</span><span lang=EN-US>18</span><span style='font-family:SimSun'>日</span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-family:SimSun'>此函同时抄送国家环保部西南督查中心、云南省环保厅</span></p></div>EJchinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15265994282426952435noreply@blogger.com0